Better to just go through with it and be done with it, than risk some lien popping up behind the 2nd down the line, that would have been wiped out if the foreclosure would have gone through.My post was meant to illustrate that the door would be open to doing so.

All logos shown are the property of their respective company and only posted for illustrative and educational purposes only”Will this disclaimer be enough to cover possible claims of trademark infringement, etc.?

For example: [All numbers illustrative only — would love to hear what you use in the brackets] Purchase Price Below [$30k] — Use [2.5%] rule Purchase Price Below [$60k] — Use [2.0%] rule Purchase Price Below [$120k] — Use [1.5%] rule Purchase Price Below [$200k] — Use [1.0%] rule Purchase Price Below [$300k] — Use [0.8%] ruleIf so, would love to hear what market / properties types you use that rule for.

For illustration sake let's call it 5 minutes and a $50 late fee.

@Jeff Cagle All the points you bring up are totally valid, but like I said, that model doesn't pretend to illustrate any sort of risk adjusted returns.

@Mark Anderson For an illustration, you could house-hack a 4 unit with an FHA loan and take all proceeds and save them (including what you would have paid for rents/mortgage). 

@Jason Bott great illustration!

No system with a 0.5 to 3% open rate is worth my time.The ONLY way you will make DMM acceptable (mind you I said ACCEPTABLE.. not "good") is if you send a crazy amount of mailers out.Give me a sec.. let me prepare a graph for you that illustrates how DMM works.OK so now...

It would be even better if you have numbers to illustrate your growth over time.Thanks!

Anyway, for illustration's sake, I bought a townhome in the Jacksonville, FL area for $137k and with the funding fee, it came out to a $140k loan.