LOLI do not get too much into politics and the big picture too much.Dennis I understand your position.My mom a few years ago had a full knee replacement.The surgeon that operated on her is one of the best in my half of the United States.Medicare covered part of it and then her secondary insurance picked up the rest.She was one of the last patients with Medicare that this Doctor took.The reason he no longer was taking Medicare is not only were they going to start squeezing them on pay outs but the bigger issue was control of the patient care.For instance my mom has one of the best knees with no issues and full range.It's the same the professional athletes get for sports etc.The surgeon was telling us Medicare was fixing to dictate to them what brand and quality of knees they would have to surgically install in their patients.All because they want to buy cheap crap to make a buck and buy in bulk.The surgeon said he is not putting in junk knees from Medicare and then the patient sues him for revisions,infections,messed up internal parts that fail prematurely when the problem isn't the surgeon but being forced to use an inferior product.More policy thinking they know what is best but creating more problems than solving them.

After recovering for a couple months my wife had complications and our son was born two months premature.

I was really rooting for Max on this one but thought the software was released prematurely and I can’t say my experience with customer service was great either.  

Questions you ask yourself would be;1) Would I generate more monthly income by moving the tenants prematurely?

Asking now is so premature.

Many investors are forced to sell prematurely and lose money, markets drop and properties end up upside down, **** happens.I can afford a infinite number of positive cash flow properties, negative cash flow not so much.

This post is slightly premature, but I'll go for it anyway.

It's premature to claim that performing rental properties are affected, although the crushing of REIT's would suggest that there is a problem, at least with their business model income streams.

It's called exponential growth and to say it's "NOW OVER" is a bit premature.  

Is that enough to protect your family in the event of your premature death?