data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fe911/fe91133f743605b2366d77af167454630c83ed54" alt=""
24 April 2024 | 36 replies
Perhaps a comment of "hey by the way" instead of a comment on the board making an assumption that someone is trying to do something wrong.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4f35c/4f35cd19d9ad7b065bf9916ca34feb7fad9663ea" alt=""
24 April 2024 | 15 replies
@Vincent BerggrenRecommend you first figure out the property Class you want to invest in, THEN figure out the corresponding location to invest in.If you apply Class A assumptions to a Class B or C purchase, your expectations won’t be met and it may be a financial disaster.So, when investing in areas they don’t really know, investors should research the different property Class submarkets.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f64c3/f64c31afbeefe53573167ff1278f721fde9da65c" alt=""
22 April 2024 | 1 reply
Assumptions: 5 year term. 80% LTV, Financing ~600K with an appraised value of 800K. $2,000/mo net cashflow.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7ab64/7ab64530edae4e7521515f16446f0ace46cbaa91" alt=""
23 April 2024 | 18 replies
It sounds good that you can just refinance before that point, but that s alot of assumptions that you are making early on.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5df8c/5df8cedb21121326a5bf5f3f95378a1d2ce350ca" alt=""
22 April 2024 | 9 replies
The assumption to disengage from possible rental increases is as asinine as thinking insurance and taxes don't increase.
25 April 2024 | 60 replies
That way, if they are not BOTH returned you have a reasonable assumption that they have been notified.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/92afa/92afa7975deef4a0b6f6664878d06ffedf69eb3e" alt=""
22 April 2024 | 4 replies
Does your Cash flow projections include any assumptions on Property tax level after purchase and Insurance rates.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/62f55/62f558972afbd623f496d26bf7c9f980a3961140" alt=""
22 April 2024 | 2 replies
It just so happens that none of the individual expenses exceeded the $2,500 rule even though the aggregate cost to construct a set of cabinets (example) may exceed this threshold.Since 1.263(a)-(f)(6) specifies intent rather than the end result (Unless you think (6)(i) would apply), since the intent of the taxpayer was not to manipulate this election for a tax benefit, my assumption is that they would be able to expense all of the items normally.Just looking for confirmation as I'm pretty confident my understanding of the regulation is correct.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cc4fd/cc4fd1300d48df0ba6417019a8097e997061110d" alt=""
21 April 2024 | 12 replies
When I studied Econ in college, we used an average 3.1% inflation rate as an assumption.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5daa8/5daa88ae94cc694fb26301740123ab6e2939315c" alt=""
21 April 2024 | 13 replies
What's the DSCR assumption with 92% occupancy, with no rent growth, with rent growth , and lot of other thing.