This kind of indecision is harmful when running a business.

We don’t know any PMCs to recommend in the area mentioned, but since selecting the wrong PMC is usually more harmful than selecting a bad tenant, you might want to read our series about “How to Screen a PMC Better than a Tenant”:https://www.biggerpockets.com/member-blogs/3094/91877-how-to-screen-a-pmc-better-than-a-tenant-part-1-services-and-processesWe recommend you get management contracts from several PMCs and compare the services they cover and, more importantly, what they each DO NOT cover.

We don’t know any PMCs to recommend in the area mentioned, but since selecting the wrong PMC is usually more harmful than selecting a bad tenant, you might want to read our series about “How to Screen a PMC Better than a Tenant”:https://www.biggerpockets.com/member-blogs/3094/91877-how-to-screen-a-pmc-better-than-a-tenant-part-1-services-and-processesWe recommend you get management contracts from several PMCs and compare the services they cover and, more importantly, what they each DO NOT cover.

We don’t know any PMCs to recommend in the area mentioned, but since selecting the wrong PMC is usually more harmful than selecting a bad tenant, you might want to read our series about “How to Screen a PMC Better than a Tenant”:https://www.biggerpockets.com/member-blogs/3094/91877-how-to-screen-a-pmc-better-than-a-tenant-part-1-services-and-processesWe recommend you get management contracts from several PMCs and compare the services they cover and, more importantly, what they each DO NOT cover.

They can make restitution part of the sentence, and it will stop her crap from harming people down the line. 

I agree with Jonathan on not allowing FOMO to force a decision that can later harm you.

The risks are:- non payment by buyer and must foreclose- lender calls the note dueThe answer to the 1st is to make sure there is a good down payment so dollar wise this does not harm seller.The answer tot he 2nd is to use a land trust and appear Garn St Germain compliant.Just my 2 centsAlan

When the underwriter has to sift through operating agreements to determine who the members are and struggles to understand who possesses ownership interests that trigger that particular lenders guarantee requirement you are doing yourself more harm than you are good. 

Nothing wrong with a Wyoming LLC (although I will argue it's not necessary) but its emphasized over all else and that's causing real harm in how many are operating their businesses. 

If peace of mind is your priority, there’s no harm in selling now, putting that equity towards Sacramento, and enjoying being closer to your family.