@Jon Q. You're entitled to your opinions but understand that they're your opinions, not fact.
And herein lies the issue with forums like this. People want to decree something as fact and regurgitate the standard party line when there's no basis in fact whatsoever.
As a result, each new person is propagandized with the same incorrect information.
With no capital at risk, there's nothing to lose but time. You're commenting on deals you don't understand presumably having never done one and want to act as an expert.
Investing in no money down deals doesn't lose trust or reputation and it doesn't use credit at all so there's zero impact to credit, hence, no money down owner finance.
Finding attractive deals in quality locations, with attractive owner financing with zero down is a non-issue and I've done it many times in your home state and in fact, your metro. They tend to be fantastic deals where you are because the price points are generally a mil plus which creates six figure down payments, great cash flow and huge upside on the backend.
The answer to your question, which isn't the right question, is, I'm willing to risk my time. That's it. I don't need to risk money.
The right question is: why risk money when it's not necessary when you can generate immediate income, cash flow and backside profit?
Newbies don't need cash, credit, or equity partners. They need education which is sorely lacking in these forums because mob rule to protect and defend the status quo ensues.
And, again, I don't know where you come up with this stuff because HNW private investors are everywhere without requiring skin in the game. I personally raised over a million dollars in liquid, unsecured capital wired directly to my personal bank account for the opportunity to participate in a deal with me. My investment or skin in the game? My experience and time. In fact, I did a call with an RIA last week with $20MM to invest and he couldn't care less whether I have skin in the game or not. His only concern is getting a reasonable rate of return that outperforms the market with a secured and collateralized cash flowing commercial property.
If I can make a suggestion and I say this with all due respect, you're selling to your own ideals, not discussing reality. I've seen this many times where people have to defend their method because they put money down and want to try to act as if that puts them in some position of propriety over people who they mistakenly believe can't or need to. Putting money down doesn't make you a better investor with greater integrity. It puts you at risk unnecessarily.
Any investment you can do with cash down I can outperform on an investment with no cash down based on velocity, cash on cash return, ROI, IRR, EBITDA, cash flow, tax benefits, NOI, any metric you want. The math doesn't lie.
Like I said, you're entitled to your opinion and I'm not looking for a holy war but consider the possibility that there might be another way and another way that may be better than what you're doing.