Originally posted by @Chris Mason:
@Trevon Peracca
LTV on a purchase is defined as the lesser of contract purchase price or appraised value. If the contract says $150k and the appraisal says $500,000,000,000, it's a property with a market value of $150k. Period.
LTV is the correct term. "Value" in this case means market value, not whimsical value. No new acronym is needed for LTV. If someone is willing to sell at $150k, and you're willing to buy at $150k, the market value of that asset, on that exact day, is $150k regardless of what an appraiser says.
A term you may be thinking of is ARV. For owner occupied loans, google search "FHA 203k." For investment SFRs, google search "HomeStyle." Those use ARV.
Definitely not referring to a "whimsical" value, but rather the as-is value based on comparable properties.
As investors, we all know people are willing to sell properties far below market value of the motivation is right.
The market value doesn't reflect when John Doe needs to sell his home by Monday because he needs $12000 to fly to Spain to be at the death bed of his mother in her last weeks to live.
If comps say his property is worth 100k as-is and he accepts 48k from because he I can help I'm get 12000 by Monday that's not the market dictating the sale. Not to mention most of appraisers do not consider all-cash offers in there calculations from what I've been told. If they did, investors would drove down property values very rapidly.
Thoughts?