I posted this thread and pictures about the fire on one of my houses.
Well, that was February, and fast forward now, after countless email exchanges, my insurance company agreed to pay me the "cost for lost investment capital" and to reimburse for "debris removal" on a "cost incurred basis" with proper documentation. I purchased this house cheap at 18K and put 15K before the fire occurred. They deducted 5K deductible and 6K for the cost of land and also budgeted 10K for the cost of debris removal. So, in total, they agree to pay me about 32K plus or minus depending on the cost of debris removal, which is about what I spent for investment of this house so far.
My question is whether this practice limiting the insurance company payment to "lost investment capital" is normal.
My house is covered by a replacement cost, but there is a special clause in the policy that says if damages to the property occur during rehab, the insurance payment is limited to lost investment capital (plus cost for debris removal).
They say this language is to prevent house builders from profiting from fire, which makes some sense to me.
but I wonder if this is a common insurance practice. If anybody has any expertise or experience, please let me know.