Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here
Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties. Try BiggerPockets PRO.
x
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Tony Asbille

Tony Asbille has started 2 posts and replied 23 times.

I live in Texarkana and buy in the Littlerock, AR and Dallas markets if that tells you anything. 

Post: 1031 into new construction but already own land

Tony AsbillePosted
  • Investor
  • Texarkana, TX
  • Posts 27
  • Votes 9

http://blog.williamsparker.com/businessandtax/2014...

Use New Construction on Property You Already Own for 1031 Exchange Capital Gains Tax Deferral

A 1031 Exchange is a popular capital gains deferral strategy for business and investment property. When properly implemented, a 1031 Exchange defers tax on property “sold” if the taxpayer acquires new property within a 180-day window, usually in coordination with an intermediary. Related-party rules typically prohibit use of property owned by the taxpayer or a related party as the purchased property.

A newly-released IRS ruling enables some taxpayers to circumvent the related-party rules, to indirectly use property owned by the taxpayer or a related party to complete a 1031 Exchange. This is accomplished by leasing the property to an intermediary, using the proceeds from the property “sold” for new construction, and then acquiring the newly constructed property and the leasehold, all within the 180-day exchange period.

Here is a link to the ruling: www.irs.gov/pub/irs-wd/1408019.pdf. Here is a more technical summary of the ruling:

In PLR 201408019, the taxpayer used a qualified exchange accommodation agreement to exchange a fee interest in improved real estate for a long-term lease in land and improvements. The taxpayer used an unrelated qualified intermediary (QI) to hold the relinquished property. The replacement property came from a related party to the taxpayer and was parked using an exchange accommodation titleholder (EAT).

Although there are several rules limiting the use of 1031 exchanges between related parties, the IRS said those rules didn’t apply here because (1) the taxpayer was exchanging property with the QI, which was not related to the taxpayer, (2) although the replacement property came from a related party, neither the taxpayer nor the related entity selling the relinquished property would be cashing out within two years, and (3) the taxpayer never owned the replacement property prior to the exchange. The exchange otherwise satisfied all the QI and EAT safe harbors, and was signed off on by the IRS in the ruling.

PLR 201408019 provides reassurance to taxpayers who want to use complex planning structures to achieve tax-free exchanges of property. With proper planning and conformity with the existing safe harbors, taxpayers can even enjoy tax-free exchanges between related entities.

E. John Wagner, II

This entry was posted in 1031 Exchange and tagged 1031 exchange, Attorney, Built-to-suit, Business Law, Florida, Lease replacement property, Related party, Sarasota, Tax Law on by E. John Wagner, II.

Post: How much does costar cost?

Tony AsbillePosted
  • Investor
  • Texarkana, TX
  • Posts 27
  • Votes 9

co star ruined Loopnet. As an investor I used loopnet daily to look for deals. I used it as a comparative when considering apartments. Now Loopnet is a shell of what it was. Many investors like me are too small spending around 750k a year on investments to justify spending the crazy high subscriptions rates. I think the void that is now present opens opportunities for another reasonable vendor.