I was very disappointed. I'm in a $$$ market such as you. NACA is misleading. 0 down. yes. low interest? only if you buy down. And thankfully I knew what the presenter was talking about, since she didnt.
The bigger catch that caused multiple people to walk out, was their reserve requirements. $15K for closing costs. Plus if you are going to have any payment shock, you must put the difference between what your rent is, and your estimated housing PITI payment into a savings account for that as well. For a year. Over and above the reserve/closing requirement. I have a 750 credit score, and when I questioned her on the time frame, she estimated it would be two years before I would receive "permission papers" to buy a home through NACA.
I took my daughter, who is a first time home buyer, looking for options. She kept looked at me and asked "how is this better? CHFA does the down payment grant, $1000 out of pocket, I'm preapproved for $300K. Can't I buy down the interest rate on it? "
I spoke with the other volunteer at the meeting (you are required to pay a membership fee and donate time to the cause) he said he was about to give up. He has provided the documents needed 3 times, and they keep getting lost. He is on his 5th loan officer, starting over each time, since no one has a clue what the previous one had done. He also said that they do a hard pull on his credit each time documents are uploaded, or he gets a new LO, and his credit is now 40 points lower than when he started.
Denver is a tough market, and since the presenter mentioned, repeatedly, that NACA was desperate for hiring presenters and LOs, I looked at their site. $14 an hour for a presenter. $8 an hour for an LO, plus what appeared to be a very convoluted commission structure. You can't buy a doghouse in Denver with an income of $14 per hour.
I really liked the sound of the NACA program, and the ideals behind it. The reality was something different. Maybe not as bad in a better market.