Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here
Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties. Try BiggerPockets PRO.
x
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Susan O.

Susan O. has started 69 posts and replied 547 times.

Post: Insurance spec questions in Carlifornia - duplex,

Susan O.Posted
  • Fresno, CA
  • Posts 552
  • Votes 181

Hi we have some rentals in southern California.  Rental single houses, duplexes, triplexes, quads

I am planning to overhaul all insurance- I have State Farm and I think they charge a lot but I have nothing to compare for Rental house and small units insurance.

I was wondering what you generally get on dwelling?  Cost of rebuilding? Like if building is worth $300k would you insure for Dwelling at $300k total or do some lesser percentage

Also for Business Liability/ rental liability what are you generally insuring on lets say a rental duplex or a rental house?

I am just doing Business Liability (per occurrence) $500k then there's 2nd part that says (annual aggregate $1M).  Medical payments to others is just $1,000.

  Is that pretty standard?

Annual premium for instance for a SFR is $300 for insuring $130k dwelling. Some duplexes are about $500-600 per year. Is that pretty standard?

We have a net worth of about $3-5M in property

Post: San Jose Rent Control

Susan O.Posted
  • Fresno, CA
  • Posts 552
  • Votes 181
Originally posted by @Chad Hale:

Lots of info on San Jose gov website:  

http://www.sanjoseca.gov

Here are a couple of links to get you started.

http://www.sanjoseca.gov/index.aspx?NID=743

http://www.sanjoseca.gov/index.aspx?nid=5144

rent controlled properties list
http://www.sanjoseca.gov/DocumentCenter/View/36039

Good articles C

Good articles Chad

It looks like some rent control will spread in California but the apartment associations are using studies and economic consultants who are unbiased to prove that it is bad when rent control is broadly placed in cities.

Rent control seems to work for a few renters to keep them in but eventually ends up in less housing stock and leads to housing crisis and underbuilding.

Here's a recent independent study done that you should forward to local politicians and state representatives:

https://caanet.org/criticism-of-rent-control-mount...

http://steshaw.org/economics-in-one-lesson/chap18p...

This is regarding Boston's rent control in 1998--

http://economist.com/node/161526

they'd probably have less housing crisis if they let the supply demand market take effect-- then there would have been more building of newer housing in the city and it wouldn't be so slummy like it is in some east and north parts of Boston city and the county

Post: Rent control clarification

Susan O.Posted
  • Fresno, CA
  • Posts 552
  • Votes 181
Originally posted by @Robert Marston:

Howdy, if you head to http://www2.oaklandnet.com/government/o/hcd/s/Land...

you can view the most current rent adjustment regulations via the links there. Knowing all of this is going to be helpful, however if you zip to section 10(p25) I think you will find the answers to what you're looking for! Let me know if you have any questions after reading, I'd be happy to offer my input! 

 Here's a little update by the California Apartment Association. 

https://caanet.org/criticism-of-rent-control-mount...


It looks like some rent control will spread in California but the apartment associations are using studies and economic consultants who are unbiased to prove that it is bad when rent control is broadly placed in cities.

Rent control seems to work for a few renters to keep them in but eventually ends up in less housing stock and leads to housing crisis and underbuilding.  Basically investors leave cities that have rent control for nearby cities ---or even leave the state and bring their money and revive other buildings in other areas

Post: Tax Writeoffs Out of State Property-

Susan O.Posted
  • Fresno, CA
  • Posts 552
  • Votes 181
Originally posted by @Taylor Brugna:

Susan O. Without knowing the specific details about your travel, If deductions are legitimate and allowable, TAKE THEM. Plain and simple. It's our job to know what's allowable and what can be defended in the case of an audit. Sounds like he just wants to avoid a "potential" hassle here. Reminds me of the home office myth that is always asked about.

This is kind of what I think. He doesn't want a 'potential' audit or 'potential questions from IRS regarding this one property

This property out of state is $6k total rental income, $15k in travel/meals and a net loss of about $25k apx.

We had to do a lot of major repairs and had it empty most of the year.  We had code enforcement as well so we had to do a lot of capital improvements.

Basically because on this duplex in a "tropical vacation area" it kinda stands out compared to the income we get from other rentals.

I think our accountant has a hard time believing we go out there just to repair the property.  There's 3 family members investing in the property so we do a lot of trips to meet contractors, tenants, management etc.

Most of our properties are in California with Gross Rental income of like $20-150k per year for each sched e property. They for most part our california properties net cash flow or break even with expenses. Their NOI is like $5-30k on the sched E

@August Faustino That LA RSO is bad.  I have a friend who has a duplex where one unit is fixed up and nice and gets $1600 for a 2 br.  The other side of the duplex is exactly the same exept it looks like a slum and he's getting $650 for the same 2 br.  The tenants destroy it and have been in a REAP program in the past where the city steps in and takes 50% o the rents in an escrow program. 

http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-costa-hawkin...

@jonathan Be careful with this new bill AB 1506 they are trying to expand those Rent Control lawas

http://abc7.com/news/boyle-heights-tenants-protest...

I hope this doesn't happen there.  Tenants are protesting and fighting to take away property owner rights.

@Jonathan A. google search RSO REAP Rent escrow program

This is a statewide organization

https://www.newsreview.com/sacramento/renters-stri...

They're really rallying support for putting regulations on real estate investing throughout California and there are a lot of states that are worse.  I've heard NYC, DC, and Boston are really harsh on mom and pop landlords

Originally posted by @David Dachtera:

@Chris K.,

This video is focused on estate planning, not asset protection. It's only two minutes long. The two day class is 16 hours. Suffice it to say, this short two minute video will not include the same level of detail as a two day, 16 hour class.

The full diagram from the class would fill a legal size sheet of paper in landscape format, and then some. To be legible, you'd want to print it on tabloid size, landscape.

link?

Wouldn't it be better to just keep things simple for now and be sole proprietor?  This guy isn't Donald trump yet.  Just let him get a couple deals first before paying a lawyer, accountant etc.  He doesn't have properties yet

Originally posted by @Kyle Frey:

@Edmund Ricker thanks for your reply.

It is my understanding that there are restrictions on how much you can deduct based on your salary if you are not a real estate professional.

There is a really well written post by @Clayton Mobley here: https://www.biggerpockets.com/forums/70/topics/362...

  • I would love to be able to file under section C but I would have to be either a real estate professional (750 hours / year or more) or be providing more than a basic services to tenants (i.e., bed and breakfast, maid services, etc...)
  • Due to the fact that I don't qualify for either of the 2 situations above my rental losses can only be used to offset other sources of passive income. In this case my "loss" will be carried forward on form 8582 until I can legally use this loss, which will most likely be next year when I can write off the loss against my passive income. The problem for 2016 is due to the fact that I didn't have any passive income I have to basically store this loss until it can be used.
  • Contrary to my initial thought I originally thought I would be able to take full advantage of a fairly significant loss (~$20k) on the property in 2016. Due to my modified adjusted gross income being over $100k I am only eligible to carry roughly 30% of the loss through to my 1040. In fact once you make over $150k the allowance is eliminated entirely.

Let me know if I am misunderstanding this or if there are ways around this.

Kyle

I've always wonderied about that 750+ hour rule for active vs passive investors. That's for writing off real estate losses onto your W2s etc right?

Well if you hire property management like I do could you still claim 750 hours? I do managing management, and still do repairs, meet tenants, deal with turnover, and spend about 3 hours a day researching and planning for REI. So would all that qualify as the 750 hrs and be justifiable?