Originally posted by @Stephen Collins:
Thanks for the info! I close on my second SFR on the 27th of this month. I ended up doing 5% down conventional, and also had to show the 6 months reserves. I am planning to get as many units as I can with conventional loans, let them build equity, and then sell for seed money for newer/larger projects. Is there a general rule of thumb for debt to income when the banks will stop lending?
This new house should cash flow about $100 a month based on my analysis. It was valued at 115k, and I got it for 95k as foreclosure. Its move in ready after a good cleaning, and maybe some new paint over all the vibrant colors (unless you love "Auburn Orange").
You bet! It varies from lender to lender, but generally speaking, I believe it's 40% debt to income ratio. Someone correct me if I'm wrong.
How much did you put into the house out of curiosity? Down payment, closing, etc. I'm just curious about your rate of return.
Also, I would suggest commercial if you can. A bank is going to want to see your debt to income be low once you make your first commercial loan, and you don't want to be in a position where you're totally tapped out. I'd suggest also setting up an LLC for your commercial loans to protect you from lawsuits, etc. and put those rentals under that LLC.
The advantages of a commercial loan is that they don't count that against your debt to income ratio, as they only care about the cash flow of the "business", meaning the house that you buy. Thus, you can buy as many as you'd like as long as you have the requisite down payment and reserves. At least, that's the way it is with my lender.
Good for you on pulling the trigger on the deal though! It's a very scary thing to do, and I wish I had started YEARS ago. Had I done that, I would be retired now. (I'm 40). If you have any other questions, feel free to ask!
Travis