Thank you, Mr Devincenzo.
After the land is leased to a farmer for 30 years, the land and the farm on top of the land become two separate, distinct, marketable properties. If I or my children sell the land, the land buyer becomes the new landlord and takes over the lease where we left off. The new landlord will get the triple net lease rent payments from the farmer just as we will have done. The new landlord will step into our shoes and continues the lease.
On the other hand, if the farmer sells his farm that's on top of my land, he sells his trees, his irrigation system, his big agricultural well, all on top of my land. The new farmer takes over the lease where the old farmer left off. The new farmer will pay me the triple net lease rent payments for the rest of the 30 years just as the old farmer will have done.
All of this is good and fine to me.
The one thing that is not clear to me is when the farmer wants to buy the land below his trees, but I don't like the price he is offering for it. I want to sell the land to someone else. Let someone else become the new landlord for the farmer. Well, during the time I wait for a new land buyer, (1-2-3 years, land sells slowly), the farmer gets pissed off because his offer to buy land was rejected for being too low. He decides to retaliate by trashing his farm, weed everywhere waist high, trees all sick with disease, irrigation system vandalized, etc. etc. He can make my land very very undesirable, unappealing to any other prospective land buyer. He can make my land utterly impossible to sell for a good price. This is my big big big big worry.
How can the lease be set up so that this worry is alleviated? How to ensure so that if the land is sold, the farmer will cooperate by keeping his farm healthy and well kept, so that I or my children can get a good price for selling the land? Do you sense there is a conflict of interest here for the farmer? I kinda do. If he keeps the trees healthy and the farm well kept during the 1-3 years while the land is for sell, he will essentially price himself out of the ability to purchase the land below his trees.
Help! What do you think? I do want my children to have the ability to sell the land to someone else other than the farmer.
Thanks everyone for your insights. Thanks BP for providing this great forum.