Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties. Try BiggerPockets PRO.
x
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Albert Johnson

Albert Johnson has started 29 posts and replied 104 times.

Quote from @Theresa Harris:

I agree with Nathan.  Put up signs to let them know cameras are in the area and let each tenant know that you put up cameras for extra security and that they are only in common areas.

 Would cattle coming onto property that may cause potential damages be a good reason due to gate being open?

Can I put up cameras on my multi unit property? 

I have a multi family property where all units are facing a comon area. Also I have a garage area that faces the comon area. The garage area is the landlords. It clearly states this in the lease. I plan to put up a solar camera on the front end of the garage.

Quote from @Benjamin Aaker:

Here are a few things I have learned from evictions: Talk to the attorney before you do anything. Make sure you document well your interactions with the tenant. Don't accept partial rent payments. You don't have an obligation to accept rent, even for the full amount, if it is late. Make sure you know your lease agreement well. 

The tenant is starting to look for things for repairs.  I plan to repair them. 

Also the tenant now wants to add the same person that was causing the lease violation to the lease. Should I deny the request?

I really don't want to add this person.

Also this person has berating me with text all day yesterday and today. I told them yesterday not to text me like that, its a form of harassment.

right now tenant is under a 10 day compliance to comply with lease
 

Quote from @Benjamin Aaker:

Here are a few things I have learned from evictions: Talk to the attorney before you do anything. Make sure you document well your interactions with the tenant. Don't accept partial rent payments. You don't have an obligation to accept rent, even for the full amount, if it is late. Make sure you know your lease agreement well. 


 Thanks. 

Apparently they paid in full yesterday,  but I am still going to speak with an attorney tomorrow. This person has been harassing me with numerous text messages 

Quote from @Doug McVinua:

@Albert Johnson We evict one or two people a year in Arizona for various reasons, the most common being non-payment. Dr. Evictor Denise Holiday is one of Arizona's best law firms/attorneys for landlord representation and or eviction. They have the process nailed down and are very efficient. I have never lost an eviction case.

The typical cost of eviction, including serving the Writ, is almost always under $500.00 and accomplished in less than 30 days.


 Thanks for this info. I appreciate it. 

I am planning to evict a tenant in Arizona. There has been numerous violations to the lease. One the tenant has been late every month on payment. As of now tenant hasn't paid. They said they will pay today after I gave 5 day notice yesterday. Another  was making a contractor leave while he was trying to make a repair to name a few.

Here we need to serve 10 day notice explaining lease violations.  Tenant plans to pay on one violation which is non payment of rent. Can I still serve the 10 day? Also if any of you ever evicted someone what is the process like?

Quote from @Kevin Sobilo:

@Albert Johnson, fair doesn't matter. You had an agreement for how to handle it. So, I guess charge them for the light fixture if its ruined. I would charge it now so that it doesn't need to come off the deposit at the end leaving you with more deposit for any other damages.

That said, I would NOT have handled that the same way. A few thoughts:

1. I would have required that a professional install it. Ceiling fans need to be secured differently than a basic ceiling to be stable and this is of course electrical work so allowing a tenant to potentially do it is a liability issue if they got injured.

2. I would have simply said they the ceiling fan stays when they move out as its an upgrade and a light fixture is a "fixture" aka once attached to real estate it legally becomes part of the real estate and YOUR (the landlord's) property. I did this exact thing last time a tenant asked to install a TV mount on the wall of a bedroom. I told them they could if they left it when they moved.

BTW, this might be the reasonable solution now as well just to have them leave it.


 Also the fixture was there when we purchased the house. I believe it's a really expensive fixture vs the ceiling fan. 

Quote from @Kevin Sobilo:

@Albert Johnson, fair doesn't matter. You had an agreement for how to handle it. So, I guess charge them for the light fixture if its ruined. I would charge it now so that it doesn't need to come off the deposit at the end leaving you with more deposit for any other damages.

That said, I would NOT have handled that the same way. A few thoughts:

1. I would have required that a professional install it. Ceiling fans need to be secured differently than a basic ceiling to be stable and this is of course electrical work so allowing a tenant to potentially do it is a liability issue if they got injured.

2. I would have simply said they the ceiling fan stays when they move out as its an upgrade and a light fixture is a "fixture" aka once attached to real estate it legally becomes part of the real estate and YOUR (the landlord's) property. I did this exact thing last time a tenant asked to install a TV mount on the wall of a bedroom. I told them they could if they left it when they moved.

BTW, this might be the reasonable solution now as well just to have them leave it.


 They said they had a professional install it for them.

I have a tenant that wants to remove a light fixture and install a ceiling fan.

we told them upon move out as long as everything would be the same as move in.

So they remove the large light fixture and installed a ceiling fan. They want us to put it in storage for them. More or less hold it.

we told them we did agree to the removal of it, just that upon move out everything should be the same.  I said we are not responsible for the fixture until move out.

They left the fixture outside under all weather conditions.


Are we being fair? Or mean to this tenant?

Quote from @Kyle Weinapple:

Hey BP, I am stuck in a situation where i have rental property in Baltimore city and it is a money pit. The good thing is that its at at 2.875% interest rate. I have owned it for 4 years now and have put a good amount of money into it already but with the condition that it is in now, it probably needs another $30,000-$35,000 put into it. I have enough in savings to pay for it but I keep asking myself should i just sell it and get it off my plate and lose the low interest rate or bite the bullet and do a big rehab and continue renting it out. I know the solution can really depend on the individuals situation but any opinions or ideas are appreciated! thank you BP!


 If it's a money pit, you don't want to loose money. Is it currently rented?

what is the potential income after rehab?