All Forum Posts by: Ryan Rogers
Ryan Rogers has started 16 posts and replied 92 times.
Post: My first deal under contract & with no money down

- Investor
- Boston, MA
- Posts 94
- Votes 30
Good Work Kurt! Get after it!
Post: 22 Years Old with 20 Units in 10 Months!

- Investor
- Boston, MA
- Posts 94
- Votes 30
Love it!
Post: Experiences with HomePath.com?

- Investor
- Boston, MA
- Posts 94
- Votes 30
Hey BP Community!
Does anyone have any experience good/bad with trying to purchase REO's from HomePath.com?
Thanks in advance!
-Ryan
Post: Typical Commission % for a renewal of a Commercial Lease???

- Investor
- Boston, MA
- Posts 94
- Votes 30
Originally posted by @Mark Creason:
Ryan,
Are they renewing a lease on an existing tenant? I would expect 6% for a new listing, but that is high for a renewal. I would think 2.5% makes sense. Typically, we would expect to get paid 1/2 at lease signing and 1/2 when lease takes force.
Mark
Love it Mark, that's the structure I went with. Thanks! :)
Post: Typical Commission % for a renewal of a Commercial Lease???

- Investor
- Boston, MA
- Posts 94
- Votes 30
Originally posted by @Christopher Telles:
As in so many areas of real estate typical doesn't typically apply. CRE lease commissions tend to vary depending on where the property is located across the nation. As you've mentioned they do tend to run the rates you quoted of 3-6% for the aggregate lease value of the lease for the first five year tiering downward for the next five, and then so on a so forth for extended lease terms.
You mention you're working on a lease renewal so immediately the question that comes into play is does the originating brokerage have claim to a renewal commission?
The next question is why are you being represented by a brokerage on a lease renewal? If its because you're unfamiliar with CRE leases, I get it. However, the pure essence of having a broker involved means you're opening up a commitment to pay when you could have eliminated the need to pay any commission by representing yourself with an existing tenant.
Brokers typically earn their commission for the heavy lifting work of finding tenants or buyers and then getting them interested in certain property's, not necessarily for "transacting", assuming they are knowledgeable about the marketplace.
Assuming the originating brokerage doesn't have a claim to a commission then my suggestion would be to use the mere fact you brought the two most important aspects of the transaction to the table, the tenant and the landlord, and you're willing to pay a commission (the tenant rep side and or landlord side) which is roughly half of a full commission typical for your marketplace. Then, try negotiate terms based on the premise you've made it easy for the broker to "transact", by bringing the parties to the negotiating table, and you want to pay the commission on terms amenable to both them and you.
If you get the 1/2 a commission part accepted I wouldn't push for terms. Pay the fee and move on. Here's why, the tenant already exists at the property which means the property owner has already accepted the tenants credit worthiness to lease the property (if you're a subsequent new owner you had a chance to review credit during your due diligence, if you didn't then that is on you). However, you can use the renegotiation process to get updated financial statements and then if financial condition has deteriorated since the originally lease use that information as a negotiating chip to throw on the table when the time is appropriate, assuming their financial condition is still acceptable.
Note: if you question whether a former brokerage has a claim to commissions (they do not necessarily have to be actively involved in a subsequent transaction to have such a claim) my suggestion would be to stop moving forward with lease extension negotiations until you're able to clarify who is owed what by whom and when.
Thanks Chris! I appreciate your thoughtful response! It helped a lot! :)
Post: Typical Commission % for a renewal of a Commercial Lease???

- Investor
- Boston, MA
- Posts 94
- Votes 30
Originally posted by @Gino Barbaro:
Hi Ryan
In my market, the standard fee is 6%. It may be a bit high, but if they can find and sign me a tenant, then I am willing to pay. I worked out and agreement with a broker that I would pay his fee split up into increments. The lease was also five years and I did not want to lose out if the tenant bailed early. I paid him a pretty sizable portion the first year, then some the third year and the final amount the fifth year. I was only able to do this because I was already doing business with the broker.
Gino
I like the spacing out of the upfront lump sum Gino! Thanks for the advice!
Ryan
Post: Typical Commission % for a renewal of a Commercial Lease???

- Investor
- Boston, MA
- Posts 94
- Votes 30
Hey All!
I'm about to get a lease renewed (hopefully) on a commercial property. I have a commercial brokerage negotiating the lease for me. I was just curious on what the standard % commission for a 5 Year lease would be? I've seen numbers ranging from 6-3% upfront of the total yearly lease.
Thanks BP community! Have a great day!
-Ryan
Post: BRRR Poll Question: With break even cash flow, Yay or Nay?

- Investor
- Boston, MA
- Posts 94
- Votes 30
Opps :)
*as far as a drastic appreciation reduction long term.
Post: BRRR Poll Question: With break even cash flow, Yay or Nay?

- Investor
- Boston, MA
- Posts 94
- Votes 30
Originally posted by @Michael Lee:
Originally posted by @Erik Nowacki:
@Ryan Rogers with ROE, ROI, Cash on Cash and all of the other ratios that you can (and should) calculate on a regular basis, they are all just indications of how your investment is doing right now. As an analogy, your car has many gauges indicating speed, RPM, engine temperature, oil pressure etc; your task is to make sure that they are indicating the proper value for your car's current situation and position. I.e. if your speedometer is indicating 120MPH, if you are on the autobahn, you're probably OK, but if you're on a two lane highway heading into a small village, it is probably not OK.
Same thing with ROE, you have to compare it with what else you could be doing with the equity. If your ROE is 10% and the other investments you are considering would give you a 7% ROI (yes ROI, because you are measuring the returns on the equity you would invest into a new investment); you would probably elect to keep your equity where it is. If, on the other hand, you found an investment that would return a 15% ROI, you would look at your portfolio to determine which investment has the lowest ROE and refinance it to liberate some of that equity. If you were looking to sell a property to cash in on your equity, you would also want to look at appreciation potential before making the decision to sell it.
Your real estate portfolio does not exist in a vacuum, where one ratio would always tell you the right thing to do with a particular property. You have to consider your investment plan, philosophy, risk tolerance, where the economy is in the economic cycle, your local market situation and a whole host of other factors. The more factors you can consider, the better your decision. The better your decisions, the higher the likelihood that you will make money in this business. However, there are no guarantees. If you want to buy low and sell high, you need to have the brains to get out near the top and the balls to get in near the bottom.
I hope this clarifies ROE a little.
Erik
Hello and welcome to BP! Cash flow is only in the title. Cash flow needs to be at least two hundred dollars per unit per month. We are taught that you can't count on the future in any way regardless of what you think. It does not matter what everything else is doing. Just walk away and look at something else. Prices are high right now so I would not take a chance on anything unless it is a hell of a deal. You did not tell what it is or how old it is. Those two things are pretty important. I am 59 years old and I found BP about 6 months ago and I am still trying to decide what to do. I have been in the construction business since I was 17. I also have earned a college degree in business that emphasized real estate. I also got a broker license that year, 1980. My father has been in the real estate business for about 40 years and I learned a little bit from him. If you think I could help you in any way please contact me at any time. Good luck!
Hey Michael! Thanks for your input! Great point I don't know if I specified the area completely. I'm talking about a 500K-600k property in the Back Bay, Beacon Hill, Cambridge area. "In my opinion" in a long range hold, I cannot see that area not appreciating. Granted potential flattening but it seems like this area is almost bullet proof as far a drastic appreciation reduction long term.
Post: BRRR Poll Question: With break even cash flow, Yay or Nay?

- Investor
- Boston, MA
- Posts 94
- Votes 30
Originally posted by @Erik Nowacki:
@Ryan Rogers with ROE, ROI, Cash on Cash and all of the other ratios that you can (and should) calculate on a regular basis, they are all just indications of how your investment is doing right now. As an analogy, your car has many gauges indicating speed, RPM, engine temperature, oil pressure etc; your task is to make sure that they are indicating the proper value for your car's current situation and position. I.e. if your speedometer is indicating 120MPH, if you are on the autobahn, you're probably OK, but if you're on a two lane highway heading into a small village, it is probably not OK.
Same thing with ROE, you have to compare it with what else you could be doing with the equity. If your ROE is 10% and the other investments you are considering would give you a 7% ROI (yes ROI, because you are measuring the returns on the equity you would invest into a new investment); you would probably elect to keep your equity where it is. If, on the other hand, you found an investment that would return a 15% ROI, you would look at your portfolio to determine which investment has the lowest ROE and refinance it to liberate some of that equity. If you were looking to sell a property to cash in on your equity, you would also want to look at appreciation potential before making the decision to sell it.
Your real estate portfolio does not exist in a vacuum, where one ratio would always tell you the right thing to do with a particular property. You have to consider your investment plan, philosophy, risk tolerance, where the economy is in the economic cycle, your local market situation and a whole host of other factors. The more factors you can consider, the better your decision. The better your decisions, the higher the likelihood that you will make money in this business. However, there are no guarantees. If you want to buy low and sell high, you need to have the brains to get out near the top and the balls to get in near the bottom.
I hope this clarifies ROE a little.
Erik
Yes Erik, that clarifies things very well! I appreciate your real life car analogy. That makes sense to evaluate different statistics to determine the best use of capital based upon your strategy and goals within your portfolio. Again thank you so much for your great input and giving me a nice education on how you can operate/analyze a portfolio more effective and efficiently!
Thanks you!
Ryan