NOTE: ALL properties are in a flood zone. Learn more here:
https://www.floodsmart.gov/floodsmart/pages/about/...
@Shayla FletcherI check all properties at
http://maps.lsuagcenter.com/floodmaps/ If the flood hazard areas show in blue, (or sometimes grey on old black/white maps) that is the effective map that is used to determine flood insurance rates and whether or not flood insurance is required by lenders. If the area is in pink, it is a preliminary map that will require flood insurance upon adoption, if it doesn't require it now. I have one property that will not be in a flood hazard area when the new map becomes effective ~SEP 2016. Whatever the case, these policies are a fully earned premium and you don't get a refund if you cancel the policy for any reason.
The rates for flood insurance are based on an elevation certificate for properties that require flood insurance. A licensed surveyor is who you hire to provide the elevation certificate and around here they cost about $350 on average. Once you have that, you can get quotes for coverage. You may want to check to see if your local floodplain manager, each parish has one, keeps copies of elevation certificates. If one was already performed on this property, you don't need to go and pay for a new one, you just need a copy of the one that's already available if you can get your hands on it? If your current seller mortgaged the property, they probably had to provide an elevation certificate to their insurer. That insurer may have a copy that you can use to determine the rates and save the cost of a new certificate.
Everything @Lynn McGeeinsaid is right. I own a property where the structure is 1.3 feet above the base flood elevation, but the lender still requires flood insurance because part of the property is in a flood hazard area. The policy was very low cost, just over $300/year, but I got nearly doubled by the $250 surcharge that just came out of the blue last December. Flood insurance was supposed to go up on everyone last year, but congress kicked the can down the road and "fixed" it by giving owner occupants a $25 surcharge and businesses and non-O/O a $250 surcharge. The change that was going to effect everyone was limited to a 15 or 25% annual increase to "gradually" increase the cost, but there was no such limited increase in this "fix" as you can see by my example.
I originally would never buy in flood hazard areas. Then I learned more about it and decided it was a manageable risk. But with the way FEMA and congress are monkeying around and changing the rules today, I think there is so much uncertainty about what they will do (and what it will cost), I am back to excluding properties in flood hazard areas from consideration for purchase.