Quote from @Aaron Bihl:
Quote from @Riaz Gillani:
Highly unlikely. Having no skin in the game is a hard and fast non starter from a lending perspective.
From a risk perspective how is it any different than a cashout refinance?
I think most lenders I speak with have trouble understanding that we buy nice houses at a discount. Had a 8 year old house we bought a month or so ago for 195...didn't put a cent into it and it sold on the market for 282 to a buyer with a conventional loan.
Seasoning is the major difference. A requirement of a Cash Out Refinance is that the property has been owned for at least 3-6mo (I've now seen 12mo be more frequent for a cash out vs rate & term). Seasoned properties are more likely to be fully occupied, freshly renovated / brought up to date and NOT the result of a fire sale or a sneaky wholesaler / flipper who dusts off the property, pulls the equity out, and then potentially defers maintenance (no skin in the game = no pride in ownership = more likely for this kind of negligent behavior).
But, like you said, there are plenty of cases where a property is bought at a bargain. No ifs, ands, or buts. And when such is true, the smart move really is to sell and put those funds into a different project.
To my knowledge, there's no literature on whether or not seasoning is an objectively effective safeguard to the risks I mentioned. But, the rules of the game.