Quote from @Charles Seaman:
@Peter Eberhardt Either option that you suggested can be effective. It really depends on you. Some people want to learn first and then take action. Others prefer to be thrown right into the fire. Many people prefer the former. I personally do better with the latter. If you choose the latter, then the recommendation that @Taylor L. made is a good one because you're positioning yourself as somebody who knows what they're good at. In my experience, I find that many experienced syndicators don't typically take brand new people on because they have too much to do to start training somebody from scratch. You can likely find a spot with a newer group that's growing and has a need for free help in exchange for education.
@Charles Seaman thank you for your response! I am definitely the latter. My mind is very prone to paralysis and I only look into something enough to know that I can and want to do it. Then I do it. Head first into the fire was the only way I was able to go from not knowing what real estate investing was to closing on my first deal in 9 months.
and if I was a experienced syndicator, no I would not want to train someone from scratch either. I consider myself "from scratch", is that wrong? Because I do know what I consider to be the "basics of vanilla investing": I know how to underwrite a 1-4 unit property, I know how to analyze a market, I know the ins and outs of hard and private money, I know what framework of a house looks like, I can bring a SFH to the studs and back, I feel confident I can flip or BRRR a 1-4 unit in any market and find the team to do it.
But I am "from scratch" because I haven't done a syndication or underwrote a 100 unit deal, I am learning a ton a day but again, doing and taking action is much better for me personally. So would you say a good place to start would be to reach out, find a GP that needs help with something I can help with and hit the ground running?