Yeah I'm pretty confused about this whole thing..
First off, St Paul has a somewhat neglected housing stock in certain areas which predictable has under market rents and has shown signs of revitalization. With this initiative, is there any incentive whatsoever in buying distressed assets and fixing them, only to not be able to raise rent to market, unless you appeal to some ambiguous exception?
Second, I think this will really cause the city to descend into segregated ghettos, where low income renter districts are divided from high income owner occupant areas, no mixing as no homeowner would live in an area where properties are neglected (not by choice but by necessity given lack of any means of recouping investment in improvement), and no investor would buy in a high price area where there's no chance of rent increase as gentrification occurs.
Third, as other's have mentioned, I simply can't see how any investor whoever it may be would every purchase any property in St Paul after this initiative, so there goes development, including that of new or renovated affordable housing, and also of entertainment, shops, etc, which attract the affluent into the city and stimulate the economy.
I'd go so far as to say this may cause a drop in asset prices, particularly of larger assets which can't be occupied by house hackers.
I've read articles stating within hours of the initiative, developers called large projects to be halted and cancelled plans..
I don't know everything, so I trust you'll let me know if the above is exaggerated or overstated.. I'm not really sure how to proceed but I sure am not planning to buy in St Paul for foreseeable future.