@Russ Draper Hey, Russ! Hmmmm, I see. Speaking to your points, we do have technically a lower income (each). Also, we were thinking if one of us were to be on the mortgage and use the property as a primary residence (living in one of two units).
I know I read on Fannie Mae's HomePath for example that they require you to be a primary resident yourself for a period of time, and then you'd basically be free to do with it what you wished. I think during that period of time you'd still be able to rent out the unoccupied unit(s) to generate income. I wasn't sure, I guess, if FHA loans looked at the situation the same way--like we had to live there for a period of time (I think for them it is 12 months), then would be free to do whatever, and also could rent out a free unit whenever as long as we/I lived in the property too.
But okay, so I guess I'll rephrase my question. Hmm. For example, if I got an FHA loan for our first property by myself and used it as my primary residence, I'd think my partner would be able to take our her own FHA loan (if it needed to work out like that) and get another property to use as her primary residence if/when the time came.
So I guess I was wondering if, with little free capital to apply for mortgages that require higher downpayments, would it be smarter to go in on the mortgage by myself to free up that option for my partner? Or would it maybe be more strategic somehow to both be on that first FHA-loan mortgage together?
I'm just worried about us not renting out the other unit for the first year and both being on the FHA mortgage and not having enough options or capital to invest in another deal until we could rent out one or both of those units.
(Sorry for such a long response!! I'm new at this, haha.)