Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here
Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties. Try BiggerPockets PRO.
x
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Michael Tempel

Michael Tempel has started 58 posts and replied 311 times.

Post: Selecting a Property Management Company

Michael TempelPosted
  • Property Manager
  • Minneapolis, MN
  • Posts 378
  • Votes 166

Great topic! 

We try to focus on communication and transparency with our client relationships first and foremost. As someone trying to market property management it is easy to get lost within all the other hats, bells and whistles you can offer your clients. I feel like I am writing a novel putting together a proposal at times.

It is refreshing to hear that communication truly is key with owners!  Makes sense, I feel like our best management relationships take about 3 months of steady communication to form into great/effortless working relationships.

Post: Wholesalers in St. Cloud MN

Michael TempelPosted
  • Property Manager
  • Minneapolis, MN
  • Posts 378
  • Votes 166

Mike,

I manage and broker in all those areas.    Let me know what your looking for by messaging me and I can likely help find some good off market properties that fit your criteria.   

Post: real Estate investor networking

Michael TempelPosted
  • Property Manager
  • Minneapolis, MN
  • Posts 378
  • Votes 166

What is the luncheon about?   I live and manage properties in Brooklyn Park.    I actually have time to go tomorrow.   Is it the one at the golf course?

Post: Rental license?

Michael TempelPosted
  • Property Manager
  • Minneapolis, MN
  • Posts 378
  • Votes 166

I see all cities doing this that we manage in.   Normally a license fee, class for landlords and annual inspection.    You can usually use proof of one class certificate for other cities.

Post: Looking for Duplex in Twin Cities Suburbs

Michael TempelPosted
  • Property Manager
  • Minneapolis, MN
  • Posts 378
  • Votes 166

Feel free to reach out to us.   We can definitely help since that is where we have all our properties.   

Post: How I almost got in jail for being a landlord in Brooklyn Center

Michael TempelPosted
  • Property Manager
  • Minneapolis, MN
  • Posts 378
  • Votes 166

I manage properties in Brooklyn Center and Brooklyn Park.   You can request duplicate bills so to see if your renter is paying.  They are quarterly, so the balance can sneak up on you quickly, but I have done this for the past 7 years on my single family units.  Unfortunately I have had the same problem, but was able to catch it right away and bill the tenant after paying the balance myself.

We also manage apartment communities in the area, in that case, we just pay the water bill.

Post: Solar Panels?

Michael TempelPosted
  • Property Manager
  • Minneapolis, MN
  • Posts 378
  • Votes 166
Originally posted by @Tanya F.:

@Michael Tempel 

I suggest you revisit with a different company.  Something doesn't sound right. You might be a lot less frustrated.  Solar certainly isn't at 1-2 year payback, but payback is only one component. 

The prices have also fallen quite a bit in the past two years. Larger (>10 kW) commercial systems should cost significantly less per watt than residential systems.   http://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy14osti/62558.pdf

I agree.  It does prove my point that cost continues to lower with time.  I think part of the problem falls under the heavy amount of incentives....take those away and I bet production cost will lower dramatically, I wouldn't lower cost if I produced solar in the current situation :-).  The other problem is Minnesota....in my area it isn't uncommon to replace a roof every three years with hail damage etc.   Plus keeping snow off in the winter.  

I can't wait until it makes sense, all for solar, thermal, wind, living roofs, you name it!   It is definitely the way to go when it makes sense.  I apologize if my tone was negative on this topic, I plan on revisiting solar in a year or so.  I just don't see a lot of apartment owners using it yet in our area and normally like to lead, but in these situations like to follow until it is proven in our market.

Post: Solar Panels?

Michael TempelPosted
  • Property Manager
  • Minneapolis, MN
  • Posts 378
  • Votes 166
Originally posted by @Carlos Fernandez:
Originally posted by @Michael Tempel:

This will be my last comment on this.   The efficiency of the panels degrades each year, which actually dimishes returns even more.   Plus my guess is the technology will become better, why be stuck with old obsolete technology for 18 years?   

I am all for solar, good friend runs a solar outfit in Washington, it unfortunately doesn't pay off yet (that's why government programs and interest free financing is needed).    LED conversions mixed with occupancy sensors have saved over 50% immediately with a payback of less then 2 years.    

 1.) Most panels degrade .7%, and the performance is guaranteed for 90% at year 10, and 80% from year 25 through the life of the system.

So a panel that produces 280 watts degrades less than 2 frickin' watts/yr., and by year 25 it will still produce 224 watts/yr. Bottom line is that even in 25 years the technology will not be obsolete, and the savings are immediate.

2.) Like others have said, first you retrofit your house addressing the main energy draws: HVAC, hot water, attic, variable speed pool pump if applicable, etc. The ROI is much quicker, from 3-5 years. In colder climates, windows are critical (I cannot speak to that b/c I live in Miami and I'm from LA, so never been an issue). From there, you can go PV.

3.) Solar is highly regional, but the average install price per kW is going way down. Where there's high demand, less so. Where there's low demand, less so b/c of lack of economies of scale. In CA, the ROI is about 7-8 yrs. The higher the price per kW, the quicker the ROI obviously. In Florida, most companies are about 9-10 years. My company is 7-8, but we focus on volume and have low overhead (one of the few licensed solar installers is on staff; saves us a ton of money).

4.) Your math in a previous post was criminally off. You have absolutely no idea what you're talking about.

I expect that you don't fake like you're a physician or a dentist or a lawyer, so please refrain from posing as if you know what you're talking about. Any idiot can do a google search of solar panels on a home and see that the dimension you quote are ... absurd.

Carlos these were the numbers given to us by the company pitching them to us for a 275 unit 7 buildings.    Basically between rebates, goverment tax incentives (which unfortunately didn't benefit us due to the structure of our deal) and interest free financing.    Without all these incentives the system would never be viable at all.   

I was extremely excited about the idea until I started doing the math.   These are for large panels at a price of $120,000 per building and in this pitch had a 20 yr payback (I wasn't the person selling this so don't blame me or call me a criminal).  My point is I think the technology is going to be much better/affordable in even 5 years, so why lock into a system that is going to need to be replaced around time of payback?    Your selling them, so of course you will disagree :-).  

I did talk to a very good developer to investigate as a follow up to our meeting that put these similiar panels on multiple buildings in the a few different cities.   He told me they were a pain in the butt (Maintenace etc. at 2 years into it) and because the installation wasn't done exactly right he lost his right to tax incentives.   

My math was likely off, this meeting was two years ago, but it simply wasn't there yet in my opinion.    I am all for solar when it reaches the same payback as LED and other items that can be implemented with a 1-2 year payback.    I apologize if I offended you, I was just disappointed and if possible wanted to incorporate it in all our communities and probably will in the future.  I had to wait for LED for the same reason, the technology wasn't reliable and the price was almost double until recently.   Nothing worse than installing $15.00 bulbs that had ballast etc issues.    Now the cost is much lower ($3.75 -7.00) the technology is reliable (I hope).   Every light is LED on our properties and it saves 35-45% of our old electric cost on average, more when combined with occupancy sensors.  Trust me I would love to add to the savings with solar!

It may be a completely different story for homes and I am sure the payback varies by region etc.    I was just revisiting the frustration of a 2 hour meeting 2 years ago.   

Post: Solar Panels?

Michael TempelPosted
  • Property Manager
  • Minneapolis, MN
  • Posts 378
  • Votes 166

This will be my last comment on this.   The efficiency of the panels degrades each year, which actually dimishes returns even more.   Plus my guess is the technology will become better, why be stuck with old obsolete technology for 18 years?   

I am all for solar, good friend runs a solar outfit in Washington, it unfortunately doesn't pay off yet (that's why government programs and interest free financing is needed).    LED conversions mixed with occupancy sensors have saved over 50% immediately with a payback of less then 2 years.    

Post: Solar Panels?

Michael TempelPosted
  • Property Manager
  • Minneapolis, MN
  • Posts 378
  • Votes 166

Solar is very incentive based, even with this it seems like a loss in most cases compared to LED lighting and other efficiencies.   

A developer that put solar on multiple buildings that I highly respect told me it was a total waste of time and money.