Originally posted by @Jay Hinrichs:
@Nathan W. well lets see i currently fund 8 turn key companies and all but one do own their own PM company as they find it necessary to keep command and control.
but I know many do not your correct. but its not the majority.. PM is a necessary evil.
and once they get past 1000 units it can be profitable up until then its about keeping their buyers happy
I am not for one second (foolishly) discounting your experience and anecdotes. And your experience that "but its not the majority" may very well be absolutely accurate. But that does not represent my current reality that none of the turnkey providers I am looking into for my next purchase are the property managers. Looking at 3 different markets right now and 4 different TK providers and all of them have the property set up with a PM that appears to be a separate entity from their TK company (with nothing leading me to disbelieve them).
The OP that I initially responded to would have been absolutely correct to state that "one of the risks is if the TK company also is the PM company and they both fold". But that is not representative of necessity and can be easily mitigated by going with a TK company that is NOT the PM company, as I have done. And I have touched base with other PM's in my target market area just in case, you know, as part of due diligence....
I stand by my original post with the clarifications noted above.