All these posts sometimes make me feel like I must be doing something wrong. I actually fell into the whole landlord thing by accident. Upgraded during the downturn and held onto my first home because I figured it would be better to rent it out for a while and selling once the market returned. The result was so good that I kept doing it. However, I don't go to turnkey companies or buy ratholes. I just look at houses that I think I would be willing to live in, in neigborhoods that I would be willing to live in, buy them (usually at market rate, sometimes direct from a builder), and rent them out. I typically have a very minimal cashflow the first year or two, but appreciation has always been solid and cash flow has improved every year. I haven't been doing this as a business, it's been an investment for me so my strategy is perhaps different, particularly since I have a wife with an extremely low risk tolerance, and i'm frankly lazy when it comes to this stuff and my strategy works since it doesn't require a ton of effort.
Sometimes I wonder if I should have jumped into a bunch of ratholes back then. But of course... I didn't want rathole tenants and all the potential nightmares that come with them... In the end, I just think there is no "wrong" strategy. The people here who have bought ratholes have outlined their success, and more power to them. I'm certainly envious. However, you will also see posts about all the rehabs that ended up going horribly wrong or nightmare tenants, so bear in mind that ratholes are all about risk. But as with most high risk investments, you also have a much higher potential reward. Are you all about "Go Big or Go Home" or "Slow and Steady"?
Oh, and not to say that a nicer property can't end up with a bad tenant or a hidden issue. It's just less likely. A "nice" property isn't NO risk, just less risk. I bought my last property directly from the builder, assuming that this way I can at least have no major physical issues for at least the first ten years or so. Wish me luck!