Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties. Try BiggerPockets PRO.
x
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Account Closed

Account Closed has started 11 posts and replied 613 times.

Post: Housing Bubble: Why it may be worse than previously thought

Account ClosedPosted
  • Professional
  • Brooklyn, NY
  • Posts 624
  • Votes 147
Originally posted by @Account Closed:

I knew he is trying to sell something.  I question if he even owns any property.  People on this and other threads have asked him for proof of his holdings and he keeps dodging the question.  I don't know if he's trying to sell property in Maryland, his website or what.  But yeah he's a troll.

 Why is it that with every post I make, I find the same few crawl out of whatever cave theyve been in to spread hatred and bitterness? This is worse than stalking. Here is a suggestion. Get a life!

Post: Housing Bubble: Why it may be worse than previously thought

Account ClosedPosted
  • Professional
  • Brooklyn, NY
  • Posts 624
  • Votes 147
Originally posted by @Jon Q.:

It's called a market cycle.  It is constant and never ending.  Just because average prices are high and average incomes are not sufficiently high, does not prove that there is a "bubble".  What is much more likely is you are in a peak of the market cycle, which I believe is what is occurring in Los Angeles (likely peaked in early 2016).  Market cycles last from 5-7 years generally, although there are many variables involved that explain why the cycle may be stretched out or shortened (ex. international buyers, extreme population/job growth, etc.).

I live in the San Francisco Bay Area.  The "average person" cannot afford to buy a home here either, but that doesn't prove there's a bubble.  There is no bubble.  There's a lack of housing (supply).

 Thats your view right? You are entitled to it... what I do know is that neither Ben Bernanke or a sea of economist af the Feds saw it in 2008.... they probably thought it was also another trough or peak in the cycle. For a bubble, you look for certain trends and patterns. The goal here isnt to discuss each element triggering a bubble per se. Price is growing at an unsustainable rate in LA compared to income level, that is the fact. It almost doesnt matter why (it does to solve problem) but what matters is in the absence of a reversal of the trend.. its going to pop. 

Post: Housing Bubble: Why it may be worse than previously thought

Account ClosedPosted
  • Professional
  • Brooklyn, NY
  • Posts 624
  • Votes 147
Originally posted by @Tom Chen:

@Account Closed, I understand the fear, and if banks were as loose as they were nearly a decade ago, there would be cause for concern. Banks aren't loaning money to people who can't prove incomes or don't have a good DTI ratio so the prices of the homes don't really matter.

The people buying these homes are people whose incomes can cover the monthly nut. 

The difference with 2008 is that you had multiple asset bubbles amidst a wide scale economic downrurn affecting not just RE but the stock market globally. It doesnt mean bubbles often have to pop in tandem. Bubbles often form in different asset classes and independent of each other. Bubbles can also be market specific, regional or local. It doesnt alway occur in sync globally as it happened in 2008. Some people seem to be misled by looking for similar events, trends and patterns as in 2008. They'll miss it.

Post: Housing Bubble: Why it may be worse than previously thought

Account ClosedPosted
  • Professional
  • Brooklyn, NY
  • Posts 624
  • Votes 147
Originally posted by @Jon Q.:
Originally posted by @Account Closed:
Originally posted by @Jon Q.:

The neighborhood income data has been posted here quite a few times. You can compute what each neigborhood is able to afford from that list. Only about 23% can afford to buy at median prices.

Post: Housing Bubble: Why it may be worse than previously thought

Account ClosedPosted
  • Professional
  • Brooklyn, NY
  • Posts 624
  • Votes 147
Originally posted by @Matt R.:

UCLA Anderson School said back in 2015 that LA was about 50% into its historical apprecation phase and predicted a return to more normal apprecation levels after that. It should be noted they accurately predicted the previous RE crash. Understand they have a whole dept who researches this stuff. I would say so far UCLAs 2015 prediction is spot on so far.  

Novices on BP have said LA was in a bubble in 2013, 14, 15, 16, and now 17. It must suck to be 100% wrong for that many years. 

 Last time I checked, there are more PhDs in economics at the Federal Reserve who's job it actually is to know these things but who apparently didnt see the crash, because usually, its seen after it happens.... last I checked, they said it was a surprise but I am sure they knew about it.

Post: Housing Bubble: Why it may be worse than previously thought

Account ClosedPosted
  • Professional
  • Brooklyn, NY
  • Posts 624
  • Votes 147
Originally posted by @Tom Chen:

Personally, I don't see it.

The 2008-2009 housing bubble was caused by too loose lending practices.

I don't see that today...

Think about it... if median wage is half what its supposed to be, we are already seeing DTI bumped to 50%, and prices in LA is growing still at a rate that further widens the unaffordability margin, how exactly will the properties be paid for? We are already at a stage where just about every LA investor is saying certain rules do not apply to LA. Properties suddenly werent meant to cash flow, 1% rule etc... these work well elsewhere but not in LA. When investor start concucting new ways to skirt around fundamental valuation techniques, making exceptions so the numbers can work, you know there is an issue with the price level.

Post: Housing Bubble: Why it may be worse than previously thought

Account ClosedPosted
  • Professional
  • Brooklyn, NY
  • Posts 624
  • Votes 147
Originally posted by @Jon Q.:

Here you go...the problem you cant fix..... I get these sort all the time....

Median LA housing price = $685,000 (zillow avg. of median home value & median listing price)

Income required to qualify = $125,000 (0% down, 4.5% mortgage)

Income required to qualify = $118,000 (5% down, 4.5% mortgage)

Median LA household income = $54,000 (argue accuracy of data with census bureau)

How much home can a household buy with $54,000 = $260,000

Primary factor driving LA prices = Speculation (may also argue demand)

Post: Housing Bubble: Why it may be worse than previously thought

Account ClosedPosted
  • Professional
  • Brooklyn, NY
  • Posts 624
  • Votes 147
Originally posted by @Jon Q.:
Originally posted by @Account Closed:
Originally posted by @Jon Q.:
Originally posted by @Account Closed:
Originally posted by @Jon Q.:
Originally posted by @Account Closed:

A housing bubble is a run-up in housing prices fueled by demand, speculation and exuberance. ... Speculators enter the market, further driving demand. At some point, demand decreases or stagnates at the same time supply increases, resulting in a sharp drop in prices — and the bubble bursts. 

If this is the definition of a housing bubble according to investopedia.... LA may be heading into some serious trouble.

Median LA housing price    = $685,000 (zillow avg. of median home value & median listing price)

Income required to qualify = $125,000 (0% down, 4.5% mortgage)

Income required to qualify = $118,000 (5% down, 4.5% mortgage)

Median LA household income = $54,000 (argue accuracy of data with census bureau)

How much home can a household buy with $54,000 = $260,000 

Primary factor driving LA prices = Speculation (may also argue demand)

All real estate markets move through real estate market cycles, so how would you compare and contrast a peak in the market cycle with a "bubble"? 

The reason I bring this is up as that many people confuse a "bubble" with a market peak, which is what I think you may be doing here.  I don't really blame you because the national news regularly write articles that confuse a market peak with "bubbles".

If you'd like to do further research on real estate market cycles, I suggest googling "Dr. Glenn Mueller".  He's written extensively on the subject.

Usually an asset typically has an intrinsic value... stock, real estate etc.... when the dispersion between asset prices and its intrinsic value widens dramatically, you have a bubble. Bubbles just dont spring out of the market abruptly but can gradually form within a certain time interval. Are you familiar with the various phases of a bubble?

I don't agree.  Typically the pricing of an asset results from supply and demand my friend.  In addition, with regard to real estate, there are many other variables that affect pricing.  Real estate demand is most strongly determined by population and job growth and forecasts of population and job growth in a market. 

I've been investing throughout the United States in more than five cities throughout several market cycles. 

 Dont agree with what? We werent discussing what determines the price of an asset so just stating the obvious seems irrelevant. You can browse to the first page of the thread where I mention what is driving LA prices.

 It's very relevant.  Read my response in regard to what determines pricing with regard to real estate.

 and if you have a question about RE prices, shoot!

Post: Housing Bubble: Why it may be worse than previously thought

Account ClosedPosted
  • Professional
  • Brooklyn, NY
  • Posts 624
  • Votes 147
Originally posted by @Jon Q.:
Originally posted by @Account Closed:
Originally posted by @Jon Q.:
Originally posted by @Account Closed:
Originally posted by @Jon Q.:
Originally posted by @Account Closed:

A housing bubble is a run-up in housing prices fueled by demand, speculation and exuberance. ... Speculators enter the market, further driving demand. At some point, demand decreases or stagnates at the same time supply increases, resulting in a sharp drop in prices — and the bubble bursts. 

If this is the definition of a housing bubble according to investopedia.... LA may be heading into some serious trouble.

Median LA housing price    = $685,000 (zillow avg. of median home value & median listing price)

Income required to qualify = $125,000 (0% down, 4.5% mortgage)

Income required to qualify = $118,000 (5% down, 4.5% mortgage)

Median LA household income = $54,000 (argue accuracy of data with census bureau)

How much home can a household buy with $54,000 = $260,000 

Primary factor driving LA prices = Speculation (may also argue demand)

All real estate markets move through real estate market cycles, so how would you compare and contrast a peak in the market cycle with a "bubble"? 

The reason I bring this is up as that many people confuse a "bubble" with a market peak, which is what I think you may be doing here.  I don't really blame you because the national news regularly write articles that confuse a market peak with "bubbles".

If you'd like to do further research on real estate market cycles, I suggest googling "Dr. Glenn Mueller".  He's written extensively on the subject.

Usually an asset typically has an intrinsic value... stock, real estate etc.... when the dispersion between asset prices and its intrinsic value widens dramatically, you have a bubble. Bubbles just dont spring out of the market abruptly but can gradually form within a certain time interval. Are you familiar with the various phases of a bubble?

I don't agree.  Typically the pricing of an asset results from supply and demand my friend.  In addition, with regard to real estate, there are many other variables that affect pricing.  Real estate demand is most strongly determined by population and job growth and forecasts of population and job growth in a market. 

I've been investing throughout the United States in more than five cities throughout several market cycles. 

 Dont agree with what? We werent discussing what determines the price of an asset so just stating the obvious seems irrelevant. You can browse to the first page of the thread where I mention what is driving LA prices.

 It's very relevant.  Read my response in regard to what determines pricing with regard to real estate.

 I dont remember having a question about what drives RE prices.

Post: Housing Bubble: Why it may be worse than previously thought

Account ClosedPosted
  • Professional
  • Brooklyn, NY
  • Posts 624
  • Votes 147
Originally posted by @Austin Unger:

Supply and Demand is determined by underlying factors of population growth, job growth, and historical vacancy. Certain markets have peaked, and supply has finally caught up with demand, and some markets are currently still under supplied, but as long as these underlying key indicators remain as strong as they have I don't see a "bubble". Just the market cycling as it has done since the beginning.

Well, about supply in LA, it requires distinction. There is the supply of listings on the MLS for instance or FSBO where owners list to sell. There is also supply from the standpoint of availiable housing stock. My understanding is that new builds is strictly regulated if not prevented currently in LA. Both of these have an effect on what is LA's price on the supply side. But these arent the only issues driving price. There is speculative activity.