Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Try Pro Features for Free
Start your 7 day free trial. Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties.
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Michael Nahm

Michael Nahm has started 27 posts and replied 77 times.

I’m in an interesting situation and would appreciate advice.

I hired someone to install vinyl (I’ve learned since that LVP is best) planks in a rental. I paid A LOT for labor (around $2,000 for 400 sq.ft. area). I would rather pay more for quality work and this person came highly recommended.

The floor looked great and he even joked that the entire building may fall apart, but this floor wouldn’t.

A couple years go by and now a nail has come through the floor, thorny side up! 

We contacted this gentleman and informed him of the issue. He apologized and said he’d come by and fix it during the weekend.

He never showed nor answered calls.

I left voicemails and we texted briefly. Long story short, lots of promises, and no action. I literally felt he was doing everything he could to avoid the situation.

Two months of dodging me, I left a voicemail letting him know that if I don’t get a definitive time for the repair, I will file a complaint. He magically called a minute later and told me that it’s been years since the install and to not contact him again.

I’m surprisingly calm about the situation (unlike me), and am considering letting it go, however, I feel like he’d be getting away with being a crappy businessman.

I’m considering suing him, and would like your thoughts, because it has been a while since the installation, however, but for his negligence in leaving a nail behind, it wouldn’t have came up from the floor.

Thoughts appreciated.

Dear fellow BP’ers,

I own a condo that has laminate flooring throughout. Recently, a common pipe within the building caused damage to a small portion of the floor.

Thankfully, the building’s management company accepted responsibility and would like to move forward with repairs. However, the floors were done around ten years ago and the precise flooring can’t be matched.

I was wondering if I should trust the management’s repair crew to do a proper job or whether I should make specific requests, as this type of situation is new to me.

There is a cooperative tenant residing in the condo.

Advice would be greatly appreciated.

Oh man, I just re-read my original post and realized I wrote “bowl” instead of “tank”. No idea on how to edit, if that’s even an option.


The issue is a cracked tank, not bowl.

Thank you all very much for taking the time to comment. 

I feel the need to add that the tenant’s size has no bearing here because the crack was not on the seat or the bowl at all, rather on the tank, which carries no weight other than the tank and water weight.

Thus, when the pro that looked at it and stated that force or weight cracked it, he meant someone had to physically sit on the tank (I’ve personally never felt the need to do that ;)) or some kind of force was placed on it.

If it was indeed the toilet bowl or the seat, that obviously is a completely different story and I wouldn’t even consider charging the tenant.

Hi to all,

I encountered an interesting issue and would appreciate your wisdom in handling it.

A longtime tenant, who had previously not notified us of an issue in a reasonably timely manner, has done it again.


This time, the toilet bowl had a leak for some time due to a crack.

As we are in the process of replacing the bowl, the professional who inspected the bowl discretely told me that bowls don’t spontaneously crack and that someone put a great deal of weight or force and physically cracked it.

Setting aside any floor damage that may have taken place, I’d like some advice on how you’d go about this. Ideally, the tenant pays for some, if not all the work and damage.

Again, any advice would be sincerely appreciated.

Thank you, and as usual, you give reasonable and very rational advice. Thanks again.

Originally posted by @Nathan Gesner:

The rental rate listed on the lease. If rent is $800 but you charged them $750 and exchanged the other $50 for a repair, you've still essentially received $800 for rent.

As an aside, you should never reduce rent in exchange for labor, for a couple reasons:

1. If the tenant fails to complete the work or does it improperly, you've lost the rent income AND still have to pay for the repair.

2. Tenants tend to do repairs poorly or incompletely and you'll end up fixing it in the future, anway.

3. You open yourself to liability if someone is injured because the repair was done wrong, or you could fail to qualify for an insurance claim if the insurance company learns you "hired" the tenant instead of a licensed contractor.

If you decide to hire the tenant, my recommendation is that you separate the work from the rent. Tenant pays their rent like normal. You pay the tenant an agreed rate after the work is done to your satisfaction, just like you would any contractor. 

I also recommend you have it in writing. Be specific about what work they are allowed to do, what materials they will use, when it will be complete, who pays for materials, how much you'll pay for a labor, and be sure to set a cap on what you will pay so they don't go over budget.

Hi fellow Minnesotan Biggerpocketers, and anyone else that could possibly answer my question.

I’m in the process of completing the CRP’s for 2020 and am wondering about rental amounts.

A couple of my tenants did various pre-approved minor repairs on each property, and after the fact, I allowed for a set reduction in rent for the materials.

I was wondering which amount I should list on the CRP, the rental amount as listed on the Lease, or the actual amount received (rent minus the approved reduction).


Thank you.

Originally posted by @James Hamling:

@Michael Nahm The problem point in all this is the PM company, and they are obviously working to cover their own butt's at anyone's expense. 

I would cut them out of it all together. Call that garage company and demand to speak with the GM. Then say you'd like to double check their exact statement as to what they found wrong with the door and what they repaired, just to get some good info before your attourney contacts for a sworn statement because PM has some answering to do for endangering residents and it's starting to "feel" like they may throw the garage door company under the bus on this one and something feels off about that. Odd's are they will launch into "that's BS!!! We told them, that damn chain drive was shot, we told them that weeks before and then it jumped just like we said it would, hell no that's not on us!". 

Then with what you find go back to PM and ask who the broker is on file because you'd like to make sure the complaint to Ellisons office and Dept of Commerce dosn't get the wrong person on it. When they ask what the issue is you reply the endangering residents is bad enough but then trying to extort an injured tenant harmed in their managed property due to their negligence, wow that's bad BUT then to work to cover it up..... well I'd just hope Ellison is pro-PM and anti tenant, oh yeah, not so much huh. OR you could just cut the crap here and now and step up and make this right with BOTH me and my tenant. "Are you trying to extort us???" No, of course not, just giving 1 last opportunity to do the right thing and avoid the hard way, your call. 

I'm sorry but everything with how there doing this is wrong. There is no scenario where this should be tenants fault. The only way it would be her fault is if she rammed the door, which would be obvious as it would fold the door in and off track. This strongly sounds like a chain drive where the gear or chain (most likely gear) "jumped". Door came down and jambed. Not to mention they are supposed to have deadfall safety catch which obviously did not work or is not present. Those doors will kill a person if they fall on them, hence why regulated for safety features preventing such. 

I would go at them hard just for how they are being about it. 

A huge shout out to James Hamling. Took your advice and called the company that fixed the garage door and I won’t go into detail here, you were right! And with the information received from them, I was able to have the charge to the tenant reversed!

Thanks again!

You’re getting solid advice here.

A key comment I’d give is if you hire a PM, demand that they let you be in the process of selecting a tenant. On paper. Not in person.

I say this for a number of reasons:

1. You get to learn how to screen;

2. It forces the PM to do a decent job in the screening process (sorry folks, I personally know of too many horror stories on PM’s placing anyone with a pulse);

3. If you do go with a PM, let them do the showings, that way all you do is see the tenant “on paper” and are less likely to fall for sob stories, and more likely to select based on legit qualifications.

All the best.

Originally posted by @James Hamling:

@Michael Nahm The problem point in all this is the PM company, and they are obviously working to cover their own butt's at anyone's expense. 

I would cut them out of it all together. Call that garage company and demand to speak with the GM. Then say you'd like to double check their exact statement as to what they found wrong with the door and what they repaired, just to get some good info before your attourney contacts for a sworn statement because PM has some answering to do for endangering residents and it's starting to "feel" like they may throw the garage door company under the bus on this one and something feels off about that. Odd's are they will launch into "that's BS!!! We told them, that damn chain drive was shot, we told them that weeks before and then it jumped just like we said it would, hell no that's not on us!". 

Then with what you find go back to PM and ask who the broker is on file because you'd like to make sure the complaint to Ellisons office and Dept of Commerce dosn't get the wrong person on it. When they ask what the issue is you reply the endangering residents is bad enough but then trying to extort an injured tenant harmed in their managed property due to their negligence, wow that's bad BUT then to work to cover it up..... well I'd just hope Ellison is pro-PM and anti tenant, oh yeah, not so much huh. OR you could just cut the crap here and now and step up and make this right with BOTH me and my tenant. "Are you trying to extort us???" No, of course not, just giving 1 last opportunity to do the right thing and avoid the hard way, your call. 

I'm sorry but everything with how there doing this is wrong. There is no scenario where this should be tenants fault. The only way it would be her fault is if she rammed the door, which would be obvious as it would fold the door in and off track. This strongly sounds like a chain drive where the gear or chain (most likely gear) "jumped". Door came down and jambed. Not to mention they are supposed to have deadfall safety catch which obviously did not work or is not present. Those doors will kill a person if they fall on them, hence why regulated for safety features preventing such. 

I would go at them hard just for how they are being about it. 

Great advice! Thank you.