"Personally, since cops are paid out of my tax dollars, I want the most qualified one at the lowest price. I don't want my taxes to go up just to get a Harvard-educated cop at my door. And likewise, I don't want a cop who doesn't know how to do his job just so I can save a couple bucks on my taxes."
J. Scott,
I think you made my point for me. As you will agree, as with most jobs, you will not get the most qualified candidate at the lowest price, nor do you need to pay for someone who is overqualified. I don't think they teach law enforcement at Harvard, but I could be wrong ( I realize you were not implying that). As you suggested, the cheapest is not always the best way to go, neither is over-paying. A middle ground, based on more factors than whether or not a police officer can be hired who meets the bare minimum requirements at the lowest cost (minimum wage, particularly with this job market?) needs to be used. Perhaps more emphasis needs to be placed on suitability for the job through better psychological screening to avoid some of the issues we have had with law enforcement. Maybe we would need to pay a little more than the bare minimum to get a better pool of applicants. That was my only point.
Vikram,
I have no interest in responding to your condescending post.