@Tim Bradley You wrote:
> @James Orr I just closed on a property around 9% below MLS.
Yes... we do see these in the data. They are just a small percentage of the transactions. The data shows how rare they are.
> This was also after a couple months of the price being lowered 2 or 3 times.
Yes, this data shows the discount/premium from the last list price (not the initial list price). I should also stress that list price does not automatically mean value (ARV). It could be listed way above ARV or way below to start.
> Just outside Orlando. Nothing special here too.
Thanks for sharing that.
> I sent out about 15 lowball offers in total and closed on this one.
How low where the others? And did you hand select ones that you thought might be more likely to accept?
> This is a major rehab though as well as sat on the market a couple months.
Yes, I did some other data analysis and studies that show you are more likely to get a lower offer accepted on properties that have been sitting.
> That might skew the data.
Yes. Definitely helps you get the lower offers accepted.
> Like you said would be interesting to have that chart.
Yes.
@James Mc Ree You wrote:
> You may be misrepresenting low ball offers.
As I said... it is a proxy. It shows the discount/premium of sold price compared to the last list price. Since offer prices are not published, this is the closest proxy we have for offer price.
> The data you show is for all settlement prices, not offers, and does not appear to focus on low ball offers.
Yes it shows settlement price (not offers) and it shows the entire data set. Part of that is low ball offers.
> I think it is reasonable to assume the original offers were lower than the settlement prices for a significant portion of your data set.
I would challenge that assumption. Having done hundreds of transactions personally... I recall just one where the price went up... most (and especially on distressed properties) the price is likely to go down during the inspection and appraisal negotiation.
Any other real estate brokers will large transaction histories seen a large percentage of their transactions close at a price that is higher than their offer price?
> You might want to adjust your theme of odds of getting low ball offers accepted to be more focused on settlement prices relative to asking prices.
It is settlement prices relative to asking prices, but my assumption is that these are highly correlated proxies of offer prices.
> Similarly, your story could be titled around the theme of the effect of asking for a higher price as the same data appears to support an analysis across the pricing spectrum.
Yes, the same data set suggests that you don't get all of your "full price" offers accepted.
> Further stratification by property type could also provide insights.
I have broken it out by price band and days on market already. I did a quick breakout of multi-family as well. I have not done a detailed break down of property type.
> I think your story shows your leading theme better if you were able to show the original offer, settlement price and asking price.
If only I had offer price. It is unpublished data. I only have list price and settlement price.
> That would allow for analysis of how far off the original offer was from the asking price to see where they settled. I don't know of the MLS capturing offer data though.
Yes. Agreed.
@Tyler Gibson You wrote:
> I sit for the state test today and will be joining a brokerage later this week. Send me a message of what info you are looking for and I will see what I can put together for you.
For this analysis, you just need to have sold price and list price to do similar analysis in Excel. If you happen to have that data, you could run it for your area and post the results to see how it compares.
@Lynn McGeein you wrote:
> Is the data based on original list price
Nope. It is the last list price prior to sale.
> (especially if it was listed higher, sat on market a long time, expired or withdrawn and re-listed at a lower price) versus sale price,
It already takes into account price drops. It would ignore all expired and withdrawn listings... as it only looks at ones that sold. If it got relisted then sold, it would use the last list price and the sold price for that transaction.
> or list price at time of contract versus sale price?
It is technically not even list price at time of contract... it is last list price.
> Many homes that sell significantly lower than original list price go through 2-3 price reductions
Yes... this is sold price/last list price.
It is important to re-emphasize that list price is not value (ARV). It is just what the seller and their representation listed the property at for sale. ARV could be higher or lower.
> and several new listings before going under contract.
Yes. Totally true.
> They would appear they sold much closer to list price if you're using the list price after the reductions rather than original list price.
Which I am... I am using the last list price... not the original list price.
> I've seen firsthand where a home listed over $500K, sat on market for months, expired, relisted $475K, sat on market again, finally took a $425K offer, but listing firm withdrew old listing, then listed it as a New listing, $425K before accepting offer so it showed a full price sale,
Yes. In that case, that would have shown as a $425K list price and a $425K sale price and would be in the 100% pile.
> 2-3 days on market, when in fact it was sold at 85% of original list price after over 6 months on market.
Yes. The data I am showing would not show it based on its original, fantasy-land list price in the previous listing. This is a better proxy for can you "low ball" based on the current list price (not what it was listed at before).
> Not sure how your data accounts for those sales, and that is not an isolated case, just the latest one I'm aware of.
I do see those too, but... and this is completely anecdotal... I don't think they're anywhere near 10% of the total market. My guess is maybe 1 in 25 or less where that happens. I don't have original list price and I especially don't have original list price for "recent" listings that would catch relisting properties. If I did, I could break those out as well.