Jerome Adams, be sure you research the developers you go after if that is your decided path. Many of the developers I am aware of look at short term calculating, therefore the cost benefits aren't always there from their point of view. They are more interested in an approach they've done before and they are accustomed to.
I'm not trying to generalize, and yes a lot depends on location. Some communities require higher performing buildings, so you will find that the developers there can handle the requirements (although they are not always happy about it). Also if you look at a market where buy and hold is the focus, and as Emily Dixon has pointed out University work could be a good start, you may find a different perspective.
Not to get in the middle of it ;> but you can see the contrast between short term cost analysis as I think Ryan Richard is looking at it and more of a life cycle cost analysis as a buy and hold oriented group would.
Of course scale comes into play and market too, but hopefully you get what I'm trying to explain.