You heard it right and thanks for your input for which I voted for you. I am 100% invested in stock market and zero in RE. What started this conversation was when I saw someone on Youtube say: If you stay in the market and plan to live on your retirement account (401K or otherwise) you will become 'poorer' every year as you draw down money into the sunset. Compared that with RE where your rent/cash flow only increase in time(technically into perpetuity) along with appreciation, leveraging(velocity of money), tax benefits, mortgage paydown etc. In other words you become 'richer' in time. Only caveat is beginning cash flow will be less in RE but will eventually catch up. And of course the passivity of stocks vs active involvement of RE, which can be negated by PM. So in search for that answer I came across BP and decided to put this question out there as members are RE investors (mostly) to hear from them vs CFP who may skew client's investment towards stock market rather than RE(for which I will have another question subsequently).
I have gotten so many valuable input from so many members for which I am thankful. Now, as you mentioned, how do I tell the sharks from those that are not! Hope to find that answer here too! Thanks everyone.