Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Try Pro Features for Free
Start your 7 day free trial. Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties.
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Brant Richardson

Brant Richardson has started 15 posts and replied 642 times.

For all the people thinking about whether to get a license, that should be a pretty convincing story. Good job recognizing the opportunities.

Post: Podcast 077!

Brant RichardsonPosted
  • Investor
  • Santa Barbara, CA
  • Posts 658
  • Votes 315

Yeah, I think negotiation is something a lot of us here in the USA just aren't comfortable with. It feels rude. We are used to going to the store and paying what ever the price is. Shopping around and looking for sales is about the extent of our negotiation skills. The role playng negotiation in the podcast was definitely helpful for me.

Maybe rotate it and save it on your computer first. Then save it on your profile.

Will that 5% cover vacancy and all the other costs of a foreclosure?

Post: should I buy this duplex?

Brant RichardsonPosted
  • Investor
  • Santa Barbara, CA
  • Posts 658
  • Votes 315

50% rule states that half your rent will be used for expenses other than debt service.  That leaves you with $1300 to pay the principal and interest.

PITI includes principal, interest, tax and insurance. The 50% rule accounts for tax and insurance in the first 50% deduction so do not deduct PITI from that.

Post: Should I Wholesale or Look to Fix-N-Flip This Property

Brant RichardsonPosted
  • Investor
  • Santa Barbara, CA
  • Posts 658
  • Votes 315

You could look at hard money lenders to pursue option A.

If you feel like a "relatively new investor" option B may be best if you partner with somebody experienced.  That way you get to learn from them, use their contacts to save money on the rehab and profit more than option C.

Post: The cursed house

Brant RichardsonPosted
  • Investor
  • Santa Barbara, CA
  • Posts 658
  • Votes 315

False ID, breaking and entering (with witnesses), burglary (from your tenant), grand theft (from you).  They need to cuff this guy. 

@David Cohen  It's hard to evaluate whether you "failed" with out seeing your numbers.  I definitely agree with sacrificing a substantial amount of cash flow to get into the better neighborhoods but you have to draw the line at some point, I'm not sure where your line is. 

Everybody calculates cash flow a little differently.  I would be interested to see how you get $500/mo cash flow out of a property which does not meet the 1% rule.  If you own them outright with no mortgage to pay that makes sense.  In which case the cash on cash return would be very low.

On your median rental, what is  -  rent, insurance, property tax, any utilities you pay, principal and interest (and did you leverage 80% of purchase/rehab), what % do you use for vacancy, what % do you use for maintenance?

I use 10% for maintenance when calculating cash flow.  As mentioned by others, this is probably too high as you get into homes that are very high rent but not necessarily any larger than lower rent areas.  I also use 10% for vacancy which is likely an over estimate, part of the reason for investing in better neighborhoods and school districts is to get more stable tenants.  I also pay a property manager, but it does not sound like you have that expense.

Post: Would you invest strictly for cash flow?

Brant RichardsonPosted
  • Investor
  • Santa Barbara, CA
  • Posts 658
  • Votes 315

There's a pretty diverse group of properties that could be pure cash flow, some good and others not.  I buy in a area where I expect appreciation but don't plan to ever sell or even refinance, so really it is a pure cash flow play.  If you are buying in a ghetto there's plenty of problems with that.  If you are buying in a nice but rural area unlikely to appreciate, I'm all for it.  I want to build a passive income, $200/mo here, another $200/mo there, one little chunk at a time until its real money.

Post: Kansas City, Missouri Buyers

Brant RichardsonPosted
  • Investor
  • Santa Barbara, CA
  • Posts 658
  • Votes 315

Joe  -  Good.  They should all drop their prices drastically to lure me in.

Rachelle- I am an out of state investor working in KC.  I will send you some information on who I am working with.