Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here
Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties. Try BiggerPockets PRO.
x
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Justin Buswell

Justin Buswell has started 2 posts and replied 47 times.

Post: Pace Morby Mentorship

Justin BuswellPosted
  • Posts 48
  • Votes 29
Quote from @Chida Truong:

Hello BP investors,

I haven't seen any recent postings about Pace Morby's Sub To Mentoship program and wanted to see if anyone can give their honest feedback about the program who's joined recently?

I noticed quite a few of the reviews were from dead accounts or 1 and done posters so I was a bit weary about the legitimacy. Being that the cost of the program is about $7800 (amount I gathered from other posts), I didn't want to to make a costly mistake. All feedback greatly appreciated.

I think you're getting genuine replies But it is important to note that if you were to say something negative or Objectionable to pace you would be removed from the membership.

Post: Pace Morby Mentorship

Justin BuswellPosted
  • Posts 48
  • Votes 29
Quote from @Jay Hinrichs:
Quote from @Justin Buswell:
Quote from @Chida Truong:

Hello BP investors,

I haven't seen any recent postings about Pace Morby's Sub To Mentoship program and wanted to see if anyone can give their honest feedback about the program who's joined recently?

I noticed quite a few of the reviews were from dead accounts or 1 and done posters so I was a bit weary about the legitimacy. Being that the cost of the program is about $7800 (amount I gathered from other posts), I didn't want to to make a costly mistake. All feedback greatly appreciated.

 It's an interesting mentorship that works for a lot of people.  The chief medium of the mentorship is Facebook.  This will be where you will reach out for help and network with other members.  You will see people crowd-source solutions and questions on nearly every subject imaginable.  There are daily Zoom calls on multiple different subjects.  These alone are worth the price of admission.  You can pop in and see someone live call a seller and structure a deal.  Many, but not all of these zooms are put in the vault. Pace adds a lot of new subjects all the time.  Right now he is doing a zero-down business buying VALUE ADD content to the program.  Part of the req to get that is to come here and review the program.  There are a ton of people getting a lot of value and getting deals done due to this program.  It's not a panacea and it's not for everyone but for the really outgoing who want to get with people to do deals and don't need heavy defined how-to-content will get way more value than the cost.

Interesting... could you tell me more about the value add content program? How does one by a business with zero down? 


 Dont know yet.  First zoom was today.  I missed it.  Program just starting 

Post: Pace Morby Mentorship

Justin BuswellPosted
  • Posts 48
  • Votes 29
Quote from @Chida Truong:

Hello BP investors,

I haven't seen any recent postings about Pace Morby's Sub To Mentoship program and wanted to see if anyone can give their honest feedback about the program who's joined recently?

I noticed quite a few of the reviews were from dead accounts or 1 and done posters so I was a bit weary about the legitimacy. Being that the cost of the program is about $7800 (amount I gathered from other posts), I didn't want to to make a costly mistake. All feedback greatly appreciated.

 It's an interesting mentorship that works for a lot of people.  The chief medium of the mentorship is Facebook.  This will be where you will reach out for help and network with other members.  You will see people crowd-source solutions and questions on nearly every subject imaginable.  There are daily Zoom calls on multiple different subjects.  These alone are worth the price of admission.  You can pop in and see someone live call a seller and structure a deal.  Many, but not all of these zooms are put in the vault. Pace adds a lot of new subjects all the time.  Right now he is doing a zero-down business buying VALUE ADD content to the program.  Part of the req to get that is to come here and review the program.  There are a ton of people getting a lot of value and getting deals done due to this program.  It's not a panacea and it's not for everyone but for the really outgoing who want to get with people to do deals and don't need heavy defined how-to-content will get way more value than the cost.

I went in a different direction so no info to offer here.

Quote from @Peter Mckernan:
Quote from @Scott Trench:

Personally, I'm not bullish on these parts of the country in the next few years. Florida is nearly uninsurable. Tons of development/investment activity going on. Same with Phoenix, and here in Denver. 

Sure, there's inbound migration to the cities and states you are referencing, but there's also a glut of supply coming online. And, that inbound migration, I'd bet, is about to slow big time when we look at 2023 data and trends. Texas people have their #Don'tMesswithTexas thing and will beat me up, but it's pretty dang hot, property taxes are extremely high, there's a TON of construction/development bringing on new supply, and frankly the politics are at a point where some residents are leaving, and others may refuse to move there. I wonder if folks are too high on the "business friendly" dynamic in the state, and the net inbound migration in the recent past, and are overweighting those benefits, without really factoring in the risks of investing in parts of that state. Similar concerns in Florida right now. So I'm going to go ahead and #MesswithTexas. I think Texas real estate is among the most likely in the country to underperform from a returns perspective over the next few years. I dislike Tennessee and North Carolina less, but wonder if they won't have more muted risks a step removed from those brewing in Texas and Florida.

Nearly all of the 1.6M units under construction are in the south and west (sunbelt and SE). Huge percentages of that are in Florida and Texas specifically.

Honestly, I like "boring" towns in the Northeast, midwest, and maybe even Southern California for the next few years. 

Why SoCal in that list? Because California has been beaten up so badly by mismangement at the governmental level. I'd argue it has the same but opposite political problems as Texas, but that the exodus already happened there and is priced in. It's still the best weather in the country (world?), and eventually, someone will clean up the streets and bring back some sanity. Even if that political miracle doesn't happen, nobody is assuming huge growth in SoCal, like they are in other parts of the country. Furthermore, SoCal, relatively speaking, isn't THAT much more expensive these days than other parts of the country that have shot up in recent years. Even if the prospects aren't great, SoCal doesn't have a the same runup in prices that other places that are, frankly, less desirable, did over the past few years. 

All that to defend a minor point on SoCal - I'm probably still preferring the midwest and Northeast to SoCal. But, just know that some people will think I'm crazy for even typing out the idea that SoCal might be an OK investment in 2023. I personally don't think it's crazy, and would rather be there than in Austin, TX right now.

Not a lot of new supply, relatively speaking in the NE, Midwest, and SoCal. Not a lot of migration, and many of these places didn't boom like the rest of the country over the last few years. 

Millennials, I bet, are going to be moving back to where they grew up to settle down and raise families. I bet these places are lower risk and higher upside than other parts of the country.  


 I would like to add one thing about the SoCal market, there are people that have recently reached back out after moving to other states and they are putting their homes up for sale to come back to this SoCal market. I know that there is back and forth on which state is better for investing, and politics, but it is surprising to see a lot of people coming back to this state after making a large move (family and all) to another state. 

I think there was a big push to leave and I agree with Scott on someone coming in and cleaning up what has been changed for the worse, and now push the scales back in the favor of better streets and all! 

 CA Sucks.  Move to TX take some friends!   

Honestly, I could not be happier when I hear people are leaving S Ca.  Sadly many do come right back.  Hard to tell from the media but appears to me Tx is now enjoying all the issues Ca has had for years.  When you have 10% of the population of the country you will easily have %15 of the problems.

As far as places to invest go everyone has an opinion.  I do like the Bigger Pockets Podcasts mentioned above.  They are data-driven to at least some extent.

Quote from @Dan H.:
Quote from @Mike Hsiao:

I have a property in the city of San Diego (92116 zip code). I have a tenant that has not paid August rent.  Rent was due August 1st ($2750), and per my lease is late the day after.  I acquired the property in mid July 2023, and this tenant was already late 1 month with the old owner. So I issued the 3-day notice to pay or quit on August 2nd (posted on door and mailed first class for only the amount of the rent due, no late fees, etc).   The tenant has also changed the locks and not provided me a key which violates the lease as well. She very rarely will text or pick up her phone.  I was able to finally talk to her in person yesterday, and she clearly looks like she is on drugs.  I offered her $2750 if she moves out within 1 week.   She says she thinks she can do that, but I'm not holding my breath.


I spoke to an eviction attorney (referred by my Realtor whose client has used her).  She said that a new law in San Diego just passed where the landlord must offer at least 2 months rent for a "Cash for Keys" agreement now, even for at fault (non payment of rent) situations.   I could not find this law anywhere in my Google searching.   My attorney suggests getting the unlawful detainer paperwork going now instead.

Has anyone heard of this new law on Cash for Keys for at even at- fault (non-payment of rent) termination?  If so, what is the law/code so i can read it through. 


I am not an attorney as such I state my opinion and you should consult with experts that you trust. 

 Find a new attorney. San Diego tenant protection act does not provide any protection to tenants that are not paying rent or who are non-compliant with the lease after being told of the lease issue (not sure if you have told tenant to replace the locks in place at time the unit was rented but for lease violation tenant is to be given opportunity to comply with the lease).

I hate cash for keys.  It rewards poor behavior by tenants.  It may be the cheapest way to get rid of this tenant but you would increase the odds of another LL getting stuck with this tenant and others doing cash for keys increases the odds you will get a tenant that has receive a reward for being a poor tenant. 

I have had tenants ask for cash for keys.  I tell them I do not do it and if they do not vacate I will evict them and if they do not pay what is owed I will make sure that the issue is reflected on their credit report.  I indicated an eviction in San Diego will make it challenging for them to get a decent unit in San Diego forever.  I indicate we do not accept any tenants who have ever been evicted. So far the conversation has worked 100% of the time and we have not had to follow through with an eviction. 

Please do not reward a bad tenant for their bad behavior. 

Good luck

 Totally agree in principle however in practice I might just do whatever I can do to get resolved the cheapest way possible.  @Mike Hsiao sorry you have to deal with this.  Keep us posted as its a valuable tale.

Quote from @Kaitlin Marie:

Investment Info:

Townhouse buy & hold investment in San Diego.

1,521 square foot condo with 3 bedrooms and 2 bathrooms. ** Inherited property**


 Sorry for your loss.  Do you need advice on something?  Happy to help just drop a line.

You have to get out there and find people to partner with. You have to have something to offer. Cash finds yield. Do you offer it? Find a good deal then finding money is easy. There are a ton of options, PMLs, Hard Money and DSCR. Feel free to drop me a line and I'll see if I can tell you more but as I said - Find a good deal first. The rest is easy.

Depends on the purchase agreement.  You should have one you use and like that would cover this.

Post: Should I pay a Retainer Fee?

Justin BuswellPosted
  • Posts 48
  • Votes 29

I'd say no to that.  I vetter my contractor and I pay him $200 to do initial walks.  If I get the deal he gives me a detailed scope suitable for running by hard money.