@Wes Blackwell
I totally agree those areas are on opposite ends of the spectrum but it's just an example. Something to consider if you've been in my shoes with multiple investments going into the great recession.
A lot of folks just getting into the investment want to look at the cheapest duplex in C- or worse areas because that's what they can afford. They buy it and then they run into tenant issues ect. and they have to sell it. It's an endless cycle for those crappy areas and it's sad to see.
The MLS examples you stated are shocking, there is a large number of income properties sold in Sacramento, but I can't assume that's because 90% of multi-family in the region is in Sacramento.
To me, that means there are areas with A LOT of 2-8 unit properties because most commercial or 8+ unit property doesn't hit MLS.
Secondly, it could show there is a lot of turnover within those properties. But I don't know for sure.
I did look up 1 Roseville zip code and there are 3,251 apartment units so there must be an excess of 8+ unit mulit-family as there is very little turnover on MLS. 36% of housing is Non-owner occupied in Roseville so there are a lot of rentals, but I imagine a big spread between single family rentals and large multifamily.
I'm like everyone else on BP, looking for the best return on investment, securing retirement as you say, and trying to do it intelligently, and help others along the way too.
The purpose of this forum was to see what areas other investors are seeing, where they are focusing efforts and whatnot. I guess it's understandable that nobody wants to share...