@Alex Theriault
After taking a quick look, these are the immediate rental comps (26th St & Eccles Ave) that I found based on square footage and bedrooms/bathrooms. Based on these, you're looking closer to $3,150 in rent for the property. Which is a pretty big difference than the $4,470 you had originally. That now puts you at $787.50 a unit. As an important note, I am evaluating this deal on a per unit basis rather than by looking at the whole property.
Intuitively, that rental number is supported by the discounted rate the tenants are paying. I think that it is more realistic to lower the rent by $112.50 ($787.5 - $675 = $112.50) than it does to lower it by $442.50 ($1117.50 - $675) for the services rendered.
Additionally, let's say the property gets appraised for the sales price of 370k. Appraisals and sales price aren't always the same, but for the sake of being conservative, let's say that's the case. The taxable amount in Utah is 45% of the appraised value (370k) which equals 166,500. $166,500 * the tax rate (0.01591%) equals $2649.01. $2649.01/48 (per unit & per month) is $55 a unit in taxes per month. Previously it had been $37.50 ($1800/48). So you have conservatively increased your taxes by 33% (55-37.5 = 12.5 and 12.5/37.5 = 33%)
That's not to mention the expected CapEx and repairs on the property. It was built in 1948, so more than likely you will have higher maintenance costs than if you were to have a newer property. With that in mind, when were the last CapEx repairs done? Looking at the picture, it seems like the property has been updated, but unsure about the most recent renovations.
At first glance, the numbers look really good on this property, and you're doing the right thing by doing a thorough analysis first. It seems like you're on the right track with your own investigation. Looking forward to hearing what you decide to do!