Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties. Try BiggerPockets PRO.
x
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: John Kunick

John Kunick has started 4 posts and replied 191 times.

Post: Is it now a good time to purchase rental properties?

John KunickPosted
  • Investor
  • Broken Arrow, OK
  • Posts 210
  • Votes 314
Originally posted by @Cheryl S.:

Given that Eviction Moratorium is extended to Oct 2021 and probably will continue to be extending due to the Delta variant spreading, curious if this is a good time for REI newbies to purchase a rental property. I am a bit concerned about the eviction problems, and would love to get others' view on this.

 Sorry to be evasive, but it all depends on what your objectives are.  If it is to buy a rental property and hold onto it long-term then the answer is probably yes.  If it is to flip it and make quick profit, then probably not..  Trying to time the real estate market is tough, but usually works out in long-run with cash flow and build up of equity.

One other key, IMO, is to focus on Class A and B properties where tenants tend to be "aspirational" in nature.  These tenants tend to be accountable and responsible as they want good credit score and rental history so they put themselves in best position to buy their own house down the road.  This is a generalization, but by and large the EM issues have been in C and D properties with relatively little (not zero though) issues in A and B properties.  And, if the EM has taught us anything, it is that diligent screening of tenants is crucial.  I have all A/B properties and have only had two issues with EM and both were marginal tenants that I was hesitant to rent to but decided to take a risk (this was pre-COVID and EM).  Lesson learned!

Post: Opinions on long term outlook for Landlords

John KunickPosted
  • Investor
  • Broken Arrow, OK
  • Posts 210
  • Votes 314

@Mitch Jones, IMO, your concerns are warranted, but your post kinda answers itself. In real estate, we've always heard about location, location, location. Let's expand that to say it's about location within the United States. As many have referenced in this thread, your best locations are states and localities that are not heavy handed.. For this reason, I have built a large portfolio of both SFH and MFH in Oklahoma, Texas and Florida. Think the reasons are obvious. That is not to say that other areas are not good locations, but I'd prefer to play in areas where government, by and large, let's me provide a good quality product to tenants that respect and respond to good landlord relationships (relationships can not be over-stated no matter the location) and stays out of the way.

Secondly, I do NOT and doubt I ever will do any type of government real estate subsidy (Section 8 as example) as I do not want to invite any form of government to be my partner.  To expand upon that, I only do Class A and B properties as they tend to attract "aspirational" tenants who eventually want to buy their own house.  Thus, they tend to be more accountable and responsible.  So, location and type of property is more important now than ever before.  As a side note, I did a few class C properties a few years ago (although I did not allow any section 8).  I sold them less than a year later as my experience, although reasonably profitable, was not worth the headaches and hassles of dealing with the tenants they tended to attract.

Lastly, if the eviction moratorium has taught us anything it is that screening and doing due diligence is more important now than ever before.  In that respect, longer term, I think the EM will have the exact opposite effect that the liberals intended (can you say negative unintended consequences).  Before, landlords like me were willing to take risks with marginal tenants.  The only issues I've had with the EM were the two marginal tenants that, in hindsight, I should not have taken the risks with.  Lesson learned!

Post: tenant refusing to pay increase rent

John KunickPosted
  • Investor
  • Broken Arrow, OK
  • Posts 210
  • Votes 314
Originally posted by @Padam Neopane:

are there any law regarding amount of rent increase

i increase rent in 5 years and tenant refusing to pay increase rent and refuse to sign lease renewal 

 Padam, without knowing what state you live in nor when your lease ends and what is specifically outlined in your lease about "notice to renew or vacate" it is hard to give you specific advice..  But, generally speaking, I agree with Nathan and Jon in terms of this tenant sounds like he is managing your property - not you.  IMO, you need to rid yourself of this tenant and move on to better pastures.  But, as Chris pointed out, these times right now might make it challenging to move on..  So the question becomes how best do you rid yourself of this tenant?

Post: Eviction moratorium has my wife worried.

John KunickPosted
  • Investor
  • Broken Arrow, OK
  • Posts 210
  • Votes 314
Originally posted by @David Hollenberger:

With the new extension to the eviction moratorium my wife is having a hard time getting on board with buying rental properties. I have spent the past 2-3 years reading a learning about investing in real estate and I finally got my wife on board (for the most part) but now she is questioning if we should buy now with the moratorium extension.

What can I tell her to help ease her mind? I know it’s a risk to take but damn I think the reward can far out way the risk if you do it right.

How common is it out there to have tenants take advantage of the moratorium?

Is there any assistance for landlords dealing with it?

Hi David, first, congrats on all you've done at this point..  Having read all of the responses, the people here are giving you great advice.  To me, it would seem your wife has just used EM as the latest "excuse" to not move forward so there really is an overall general hesitancy that you/she needs to get past.

If it's any consolation, my wife also was hesitant for much the same reasons you provided.  This was 10+ years ago when we were just starting our RE venture.  Now, she's the biggest cheerleader!  And, we've been able to retire based on the RE ventures.  But, like someone else suggested, we had significant cash reserves which helped quell her fears as she saw we could "ride the storm out" if necessary.  Thankfully, the storm never materialized and we used those reserves to double/triple down once she saw how well the rentals were working out.

I would also say make sure the first one or two are either Class A or B which will attract tenants that most likely will be "aspirational" (want to get to point they can buy their own house so they will go above and beyond to make sure you get paid).  Once you do your first one or two successfully, your wife will most likely be pushing you to do more and the roles might become reversed :)

Post: What has caused 10-20% rent growth and will it last?

John KunickPosted
  • Investor
  • Broken Arrow, OK
  • Posts 210
  • Votes 314

@Bobby Larsen, I've read this entire thread and would like to take a stab at encapsulating it as I actually understand, or at least think I do, everyone's responses..  It's the differences between macroeconomics and microeconomics.

Macroeconomics - inflation is up, there is way too much money out there chasing  lower housing supply, interest rates are probably artificially low and we have supply and labor chain issues due to COVID and never before seen levels of government "regulations" at both federal and state/local levels.

Microeconomics - Some cities, states, regions are doing better than others.  Some people are moving out of areas (for whatever reasons) and moving to other areas.  And, we have illegal immigrants moving to all areas of the country creating a hard-to-measure impact on rental demand.  Add to that, the eviction moratorium seems to have very little impact on Class A/B properties (and some would say it's actually benefited A/B) while it's had more impact on Class C..

I could add to the items above, but if you read all the posts, think you will see a common theme is macro vs. micro..  So, what should a savvy investor do?  What they've always done, but probably need to do more of and do it more diligently, and that is research about the dynamics that are going on in each sub-market and due diligence about what the future looks like based on those dynamics.

What is going on in California is entirely different than what is going on in Tulsa..

Post: Tenant's Ex and New Girlfriends Drama

John KunickPosted
  • Investor
  • Broken Arrow, OK
  • Posts 210
  • Votes 314
Originally posted by @Eric James:

Ignore all the stories tenants tell you. First, all adults who live in the property should be on the lease. You don't let anyone "off" a lease.they have signed. If the GF is on the lease she would need to sign an amendment to add a new resident to the lease. Which she wouldn't likely do. 

Hi Eric, I'm just curious why you think all adults who live in the property should be on the lease?  I actually disagree and my experience saids that usually, except in cases where the two adults living in property are married,  only one adult should be on lease and therefore that person is totally responsible for rent and all matters of the lease.  Early on in my landlord experience, I had every adult on the lease and it ended up with me having to chase multiple people for rent and lease issues.  Now, I only have one person..  Yes, that person has to be really responsible, but I've avoided repetitive multi-tenant issues where I'm put in the middle of issues like the one mentioned at the beginning of this post.

Post: Non-renewal vs Eviction

John KunickPosted
  • Investor
  • Broken Arrow, OK
  • Posts 210
  • Votes 314
Originally posted by @Amanda Thompson:

We have tenants who haven't paid rent this month (it's now the 10th). We just took over property management duties of all our own properties at the very beginning of the month, which was a surprise to everyone when the other PM dumped it on us.

They are on month to month lease. So, if they do pay rent now, we still do not want to renew the lease.

Do I have to give 30 days notice not to renew? So in essence, they can stay there until October 1st because it's less than 30 days to Sept 1? I think if they continue to not pay rent then it won't matter because eviction proceedings will take priority, right?

 Non-renewal is a totally different issue than eviction (which is a legal proceeding)..  With non-renewal you typically just give them notice that you are not interested in renewing their lease and are advising them to vacate the premises.  The amount of notice is most likely a matter of state or local law.  Also, those laws might dictate that you have to provide explanation of why you don't want to renew and the method by which you must communicate.  The key point that non-renewal is not a legal proceeding.

An eviction is a legal proceeding.  As @Dave Poeppelmeier outlines, what you need to do for an eviction varies by state and county.  IMO, the best thing for you to do, should you want to start an eviction, is contact a local RE attorney and start building a relationship with him/her.  If you do plan to self-manage your properties in future, this relationship will be helpful..

Either way, best of luck!

Post: Simple (or simpler) Rental Agreement

John KunickPosted
  • Investor
  • Broken Arrow, OK
  • Posts 210
  • Votes 314

@Bear Geiger, the best advice IMO in terms of avoiding issues with Eviction Moratorium is to do best tenant screening up front. The second best advice is to buy properties in the A/B category that tend to attract accountable/responsible tenants. In our state of Oklahoma, we tend to be landlord friendly, so I have an 8-page lease that I got from a local RE attorney. Like others have said, since I started a relationship with this attorney by paying him for the lease, I have a built-in network to help me when evictions or other tenant issues come up (it's amazing how tenants react to getting a letter from an attorney). As others have said, your lease will not protect you from federal or state law (not that the EM is law per se since even Biden has said it's unconstitutional) so your best bet is to do the things outlined.. BTW, in all my years of doing SFH, I've only had to do two evictions and not one of those has been during EM.. Not bragging and really am thankful, but would greatly encourage you to heed the advice that those here have given as all of it is solid..

Post: Rental Moratorium ruining my plans

John KunickPosted
  • Investor
  • Broken Arrow, OK
  • Posts 210
  • Votes 314
Originally posted by @Leroy Norris:

I bought a duplex in May, 2 tenants pay $325 under market, I told them I would honor they contract until it expires November 1, 2021… I had full intentions of letting their lease expire and renovating both units to hit the top of market, plus I pick the tenants…. Now this president has extended the eviction moratorium and I’m at a crossroads because it gives these tenants more rights to stay in place without being able to evict…. Should I just hold off on getting them out and be happy I’m collecting or take my chances that they will just move when I inform them…

Hi Leroy, first, congrats on the duplex.  Is this your first rental property?  Second, have you built a good relationship with these tenants? Third, what does the lease say about options at expiration (30-day notice for example)?

I would sit down with each of them, probably 30-45 days before end of current lease, and provide them a list of options, all based on what the current lease outlines, which might go something like this:

  • 1. You can continue to stay in the duplex, as is, meaning there will be no upgrades.  But, your monthly rent will go up based on market.  Since you are not upgrading the unit, maybe you raise the rent by half of the difference between current and market.  We will sign a one-year lease and re-evaluate at end of year.
  • 2. You can continue to stay in the duplex for another sixty/ninety days, but must move out by that time.  This will give the tenant extra time to evaluate their options, find another place to live and also see that you are working with them.  Maybe keep the rent the same or raise it by $50 per month as a month-to-month premium
  • 3. Ask them to leave at end of lease.  Let them know your intention is to totally upgrade the units so that eventually you can raise the rent to market.  Be very open with them about what the market has done over past couple of years.  This should be an open give and take where you ask them what their intentions/options are.

You might find out that only one of your tenants wants to stay and the other wants to go.  If so, you've created a win/win situation for yourself.  You not only continue to get paid rent on one side, but you get to upgrade the other side and test what upgrades will fetch what rent.  Also, the tenant that stays sees what you are doing and may say "hey, when you get that other side done, I'd like to move in and will be glad to pay you what your asking price is"..  I've had almost this exact same scenario with a duplex here in Tulsa.  By doing this, I was able to spread out the renovation expenses over six months, collect rent on one half, convert a somewhat unknown tenant into a really great tenant and then eventually I got the other side rehabbed and now both sides are paying market rent!

    Post: First property has tenant in one unit

    John KunickPosted
    • Investor
    • Broken Arrow, OK
    • Posts 210
    • Votes 314
    Originally posted by @Connor Kerr:

    I'm about to buy my first property (house hack duplex) and one unit already has a tenant who according to the description, "doesn't plan on leaving any time soon". If I decide to keep them, should I treat them like a tenant who is a applying? For example, should I screen them, collect a security deposit, and so forth. Or should I basically just have them sign a new lease between us and call it a day?

    Hi Connor, first, best of luck with your first property and with all of your REI in the future! Second, I would encourage you to go back to the sellers to determine if the current tenant has a lease in place. If there is a lease, then usually state law will dictate you must honor the existing lease. If no lease, then I would approach that tenant and be very professional and ask what their situation and intent is. Like someone else said, killing them with kindness to create a win/win has always been the best approach.. Third, I've had these situations many times in the past.. By far, the best approach is to do your due diligence up front before you close on the property. I've even arranged for both myself and the seller (who should have a relationship with the current tenant) to go meet with the current tenant to inform them the property is being sold and letting the tenant know what your intentions are (to be a very good landlord) and to ask them what their intentions are..

    Again, best of luck with your REI!!