@Mitch Jones, IMO, your concerns are warranted, but your post kinda answers itself. In real estate, we've always heard about location, location, location. Let's expand that to say it's about location within the United States. As many have referenced in this thread, your best locations are states and localities that are not heavy handed.. For this reason, I have built a large portfolio of both SFH and MFH in Oklahoma, Texas and Florida. Think the reasons are obvious. That is not to say that other areas are not good locations, but I'd prefer to play in areas where government, by and large, let's me provide a good quality product to tenants that respect and respond to good landlord relationships (relationships can not be over-stated no matter the location) and stays out of the way.
Secondly, I do NOT and doubt I ever will do any type of government real estate subsidy (Section 8 as example) as I do not want to invite any form of government to be my partner. To expand upon that, I only do Class A and B properties as they tend to attract "aspirational" tenants who eventually want to buy their own house. Thus, they tend to be more accountable and responsible. So, location and type of property is more important now than ever before. As a side note, I did a few class C properties a few years ago (although I did not allow any section 8). I sold them less than a year later as my experience, although reasonably profitable, was not worth the headaches and hassles of dealing with the tenants they tended to attract.
Lastly, if the eviction moratorium has taught us anything it is that screening and doing due diligence is more important now than ever before. In that respect, longer term, I think the EM will have the exact opposite effect that the liberals intended (can you say negative unintended consequences). Before, landlords like me were willing to take risks with marginal tenants. The only issues I've had with the EM were the two marginal tenants that, in hindsight, I should not have taken the risks with. Lesson learned!