@Josh Haney You mentioned you want to be passive because you are working a W2. In my experience, turnkey rentals are not passive. As Scott mentioned - they "should" be "mostly" passive. In reality, unless you find a really high quality property manager - which is quite difficult - it won't be passive. I owned almost ten single family turnkey rentals in four different markets with 7 different properties managers and it was not passive at all. I spent most of my time managing the property manager - it was difficult and frustrating and very few of my properties ever cash-flowed as projected. Even if you find a great property manager - you still have to manage the asset which includes corresponding with the PM, addressing issues like vacancy and repairs, reading and reacting to reports, replacing tenants and all of the other issues that come up. I was fortunate that I owned these properties when asset values continued to rise, so although I didn't make money on cash flow, I did very well on appreciation. That will be much more difficult in the current market.
I am sure there are plenty of people who are successful at turnkey rentals, but most of the people I know that were in that space because they had W2's and wanted to be passive have changed strategies and now invest in real estate syndications.
The advantage of syndications is you effectively hire a professional asset manager that handles every aspect of managing the property - including handling the property manager. Your main job as an investor is to find and vet the operator/asset manager, research the asset class and market and analyze the deal. Once you make the investment your responsibilities are done - you just sit back and wait for distributions (hopefully!) and read the reports. In my experience, the returns of syndications outpace the returns of turnkey while costing much less time. There are many advantages to syndications - you can get exposure to many different asset classes without having to develop deep expertise, you can get into multiple different markets, you don't need to worry about obtaining bank financing, you can diversify easily by investing smaller amounts than a down payment on a rental property and you have a professional asset manager in charge of each of the assets you choose to invest in.
The major downsides of syndication investing is that these are long-term, illiquid investments that are completely out of your control. You don't (usually) get a say in when the asset is sold - it could be sold too early for you or too late. The operator can sell it before the initial estimated hold or long after. If you need cash and you own a rental property - you can sell, even if you lose money and get some capital back. If you own a syndication and need cash, you are most likely out of luck.
I have done house flipping, single family turnkeys, small multi-family and syndications. For a passive investor, syndications have proven much more efficient for my time and for the returns earned. If you are buying rental real estate - turnkey, BRR or any other way - your success requires that you have some expertise that beats the others in your market. If you don't, your returns will suffer. With syndications, you don't need market specific or asset specific expertise. Of course, you will need to educate yourself in how to vet operators, research markets, learn about different asset classes and analyze deals - but your results will be driven by professional asset managers that have full time jobs in their markets and asset classes and it is hard for an investor to beat these professionals.
If you are set on investing in turnkeys - go for it! I encourage you to look into syndications as well because they are designed for people like you - working a day job and wanting to invest passively in real estate! Good luck!