Originally posted by @Account Closed:
Perhaps I should spell this out for people. The government is not a fan of bitcoin. This is because all of the experts say all cryptocurrencies are for the purpose of money laundering. Banks do not tell you when they report your transactions as suspicious to the government.
Many transactions over about $9500 ($10,000 is a soft cutoff. Multiples of $9000 + will also automatically get reported) that a bank can tell are from a cryptocurrency conversion will be reported. It is done with a simple click by the teller or by a processor later.
Each one of those reported transactions makes it more likely the person will be audited by the IRS. If you are a foreign national or someone else that might be on a watch list those are the exact transactions the USA PATRIOT Act's financial provisions were meant to detect.
I'm not sure where you are getting your information but my experience as someone who holds (and transacts) in large amounts of bitcoin:
1) Money laundering with bitcoin is no easier than with cash. In fact, the blockchain is public and completely NOT anonymous this is a common misunderstanding. It is very easy to trace bitcoin transactions they are in plain site and any exchange that operates in the United States has to abide by the same KML and anti-terrorism and anti-money laundering laws and as any other financial institution.
2) Everything you wrote also equally applies to cash. There is no difference. Anything above $10K in cash is also reported.
3) Likelihood of an audit is not a concern unless you are hiding money. That's not what I'm trying to do. Most people with lots of money have a higher chance of being audited anyway.
4) The government does not hate bitcoin, it has been adopting a wait and see approach but I encourage you to read actual government statements like the one released today by the SEC chief on ICOs. Bitcoin transactions are 100% transparent and available on a public ledger. It's a dream for the IRS and far easier to track than cash. Why would they be against that?
Your statements may have been accurate 4-5 years ago but they just aren't true anymore.