Sorry to jump in late here, but are a few misunderstandings in this post, and OP's answer is actually pretty straightforward!
By way of credibility, 'm attorney dealing in corporate-planning and asset protection in Utah and work primarily with real estate investors.
Rob is right in that it is always a good idea to have a strong umbrella policy in place to protect you and your assets. Keep in mind however that is an insurance company's job to deny claims, and that they are very good at doing so. Their paying out is not guaranteed and it is not guaranteed that an award granted to a plaintiff would be less than the policy amount.
With that in mind, an LLC is the next layer of protection after your insurance policy. Rob is incorrect in saying that an LLC can be disregarded by a plaintiff's attorney. Yes, you as the owner may be named in a suit, but in Utah at least, there has never been a court case where the owners of a properly maintained Limited Liability Company have been found personally liable for the acts or responsibilities of the Company. If, in the examples above, an LLC is the owner of a piece of property, then should the plaintiff prevail in their suit, they may properly attached to everything the LLC owns to satisfy the judgement they've been awarded, but they may NOT attach to assets the LLC doesn't own, such as the owner's personal accounts, property, etc. That is like saying each time Apple loses a products liability law suit, the shareholders must personally pay out their bank accounts to the plaintiff. Incorrect. There is a lot of corporate maintenance, accounting, etc. and rules that must be observed to maintain the integrity of an LLC, but they are simple once you've learned them.
As in Texas, Utah also benefits from Series, LLCs which allowed risk stemming from properties to be isolated to each respective property, so that a tenant in one property may not sue for the assets of the entire portfolio, but only for that single property in which they were injured.
The multi-member vs. single member LLC debate is very common here in Utah. It boils down to this: multi-member LLCs benefit from charging order protection, meaning the company can't be held responsible for the liabilities of the owners. Single member entities don't receive this protection, but all other protections afforded by an LLC are preserved, again, at least in Utah. This means that SMLLCs still retain the protection whereby the acts of the company cannot be imputed to the owner.
An LLC registered in one state can owner property in any other state, it must simply register with that state's division of corporations and obtain authorization to do business there. A new LLC doesn't have to be created in that state, only registered.
I sincerely hope this all helps and if anyone has any questions please feel free to call or email:
Breglio Law Office
[email protected]
(801) 560-2180