Originally posted by @James Wise:
Originally posted by @Account Closed:
Originally posted by @James Wise:
Originally posted by @Account Closed:
I've been reading through the forums here and I've read a lot of posts about how the tenants should have the money saved up to pay rent in an emergency, and if not they should use a credit card or the money in their retirement account to pay rent.
Yes, they signed a contract to pay a certain dollar amount for a certain period of time but no one saw this disaster coming.
Instead of forcing them into debt or draining their retirement accounts why don't you just let them leave. Let them break the lease and go live with family or friends. Or you can give them a lower dollar amount to pay for the next 90 days.
The truth is that you should have adequate reserves for situations like this as a "professional investor". Try to have some compassion for the average person who makes very little money compared to you and probably lives paycheck to paycheck.
Do you think it's practical to ask Grocery stores to give discounts on food whenever someone is having a tough time? Should Walmart do the same when they're selling t-shirts? Where do you draw the line?
If it was the deciding factor in whether or not they stayed in business I'm sure they'd consider it.
I'm not saying let them live there for free. I'm saying to 1. agree on a lower payment and or 2. let them break the lease (keep the deposit if you'd like) BUT don't tell them to 1. leverage high interest credit cards, 2. use their retirement fund, 3. use their kids college fund, 4. etc...
What does staying in business have to do with your thread? You haven't advocated for anything that would assist a struggling business keep from going under. Nor am I confident you'd even be qualified to do so.
james you being on the firing line with hundreds if not a thousand plus homes to manage I have to think you have had strategy communication with your owners and your tenants.. I just have one rental that is run by a PM and i have been getting updates from them on how they are planning to handle our tenant/property.. these are high end white collar professionals that i believe are still working.
I think the issue is not really a moral issue.. but it certainly is a reality issue.. Now 30 days ago I was pretty certain that without govmit help we were going to have an apocalypse in work force housing owners.. And made a post 30 days ago wanting to know how landlords would handle this as a business owner.. Most responded if they dont pay its not my problem and we evict etc.
As one who had to work out about 200 plus bad loans in the GFC that i held the paper on.. that taught me that workouts are best if you can do it. No one should not pay their rent if they have the means.
And with all the fear on BP the last two weeks it appears through the stim package unemployment etc Big brother is going to come to the rescue and there should not be massive no pays.. at least I am thinking that..
The risk I see though for landlords is again kind of like the GFC were you had strategic defaults.. people made money they Could pay their mortgage but they chose to let their credit get trashed and squatted for years in many cases or walked. I know at least how our C/D class renters operate and think ( having had 300 of those) and they get checks and I fear the last thing they are going to do is pay rent if they think there is a moratorium on paying etc.. that is where I see risk right now.
But working with tenants through this is just a REALITY and my thought is and us lenders learned the hard way that taking a tough stand with someone who cant pay you anyway is just going to lead to more trouble.
the idea that most renters have a 401k they can draw from or a big savings etc again in my experience at least in work force housing this thing dont really exist for many if not most.
Lastly one of my bizz partners owns a 150 unit B class in the northwest his manager sent an email and said be prepared for 40% no pays for one to three months.. now with all this bail out I dont think it will be that bad.. And for him who basically owns it free and clear its just lost revenue not a huge nut to crack.. But if you have 40% non pay with the crop of newbie syndicators and highly leveraged deals there could be some failures in those assets if this persisted for any length of time.
So bottom line now with bail out and with landlords being polite yet firm this should not be the worse case scenario many are worried about.
It has been a wake up call to highly leveraged landlords though that 2 to 3 months reserves maybe inadequate for safety.