Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here
Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties. Try BiggerPockets PRO.
x
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Jared McCullough

Jared McCullough has started 19 posts and replied 118 times.

Post: Cash vs Financing on low cost properties?

Jared McCulloughPosted
  • Posts 122
  • Votes 44
Originally posted by @Justin R.:

@Jonathan R. Honestly I've done quite a few but let's not get into the chest puffing game. I'm not going you say you can't make money on cheap homes, several people have got into that niche and done well.

If you're still finding 20k homes bringing in 800 a month good for you. In regard to you remark, most investors would never settle for 1300 a month on a 200k home.

From my experiences this is what I have learned (as a general rule of thumb.)

1. Low end homes have higher turnover

2. More vacancy

3. More time spent doing Tennant checks attempting to find an approved Tennant

4. Much more maintenance

5. Much higher capital expense as a percentage. A hot water heater is going to be same cost at both homes, if your rent is triple the hot water heater is only one third of the cost based upon a percentage.

6. Harder to find quality property managers

7. Harder exit strategy, as many primary home owners won't be willing to buy in war zones

8. Lower Tennant pool, as families will most likely seek better school districts

9. Less likely to appreciate (unless your in the pathway to gentrification)

10. Less principle paydow.

I know this isn't the question the OP asked, but it's relevant as paying cash for a cheap home would take similar capital to a down payment on a quality home.

 For some areas even $1300 a month is considered on the higher end of rent market (i.e. we are not all in CA or NY where absurd rent numbers can be had). As you stated @ $1300 a month on a $200k loan you would barely be making your mortgage payments on a 30 yr. Not to many people in Western Pa want or can spend $1500+ a month on rent. So assume you can get $1500 you are basically getting break even and have to manage a house for 30 years. Again I am sure it make sense in some areas but this model would not work in a lot of areas. This then further exploits the vacancy discussion in that if your rent is so high the population interested may be substantially less because most can't afford. To many variables to say but I think one of the biggest things is understanding the market cap in the area you are interested and then setting price points accordingly. If I am going to struggle to get $1200 in rent no reason to spend over $125k when I can make $750 rent spending $30-40K. People are to quick to assume that just because the house sells for $30K it is a pile of junk in some run down neighborhood. 

Post: Cash vs Financing on low cost properties?

Jared McCulloughPosted
  • Posts 122
  • Votes 44
Originally posted by @Jim K.:

I took the night off. The SimpliSafe went off, but I told the monitoring team I'd handle it and not to call the cops.  I headed over to our latest renovation property project to find that a sensor had come unstuck. But the drive...here's me with my shorty 12-gauge, driving to a 3/2/1 I paid $25K cash for in December. It's on the edge of a heroin ghetto I know well. The house next door is abandoned and falling apart. There's a series of open lots across the street. Isolated as hell in the middle of a city. Dark as a forearm's length up a pig's butt. This thread kept running through my head. In Detroit I've heard there are places slumlords only go in with vests, guns strapped fore and aft.

 I chose this life. There are incredibly rewarding parts for someone who grew up broke and knows what poverty does to people. I've helped more people than I've hurt, I believe. I've got my exit strategy mostly mapped out. I'm well on my way to hitting my modest numbers and putting the money into different, easier-to-manage assets. And I'm getting this done despite wasting years and making dozens of stupid money/career/life decisions.

Would I get into this twenty years ago with a job that allowed me to sock away $24K a year? Hell, no! Even with my handyman background, I'd househack a few duplexes in up-and-coming neighborhoods for my cost-of-life cashflow and tax advantages and start loading everything else into index funds. Stuff my 401K and IRA and every other tax-advantaged vehicle like a pinata, then quit once I hit my numbers, roll as much of it as possible into the IRA and start laddering it out into a Roth while I lived off the duplex cash flow and declared on-paper depreciation losses year after year.

Become a long-distance slumlord? Are you kidding me?

This was quite an interesting read lol....

Assuming your mostly investing in areas closer to inner city? I think what many others have mentioned is key is that knowing the demographic and understanding the neighborhoods to avoid because you grew up in the area is probably a substantial piece when approaching these low cost houses. Many cities such as Pittsburgh and it surrounding parts have an abundance of low cost housing. While I could easily be picking up housing in Monessen, New Kensington, or Penn Hills I personally have made the conscious decision to look further out of the city. While these towns I am interested in are still what most would consider "slummy" they are much smaller and attract a completely different demographic (i.e. lower income blue collars). There may not be 100 houses for under $30k but there are still consistently always a handful.

I am in basically the same situation with a 3 way LLC in which a house was purchased but still under renovation so no income was gained. This being said this thread has me somewhat confused because some suggest it needs done while other suggest it doesn't. I am somewhat under the impression this then puts the decision on the LLC which to me seems a little backwards. Is there no "Right" answer?

Originally posted by @Jay Hinrichs:
Originally posted by @Jared McCullough:
Originally posted by @Jay Hinrichs:

what your seeking does not really exist in the market place..  and your on the right track to limit your loans on rentals that have 5 year calls.. those types of loans sunk a lot of investors last GFC  when their loans were called and credit was frozen.. lots of perfectly performing properties were lost.

Jay when you suggest that these 5 year "reset" (i.e. as the bank had referred to them) that there was were an issue that instead of providing a modified interest rate they literally did not approve the loan at all? This was not explained to me by the loan officer.

Jared

you need to read your note..  on commercial loans they are usually call notes with a roll over at a new interest rate.. they are not owner occ  adjustable rate mortgages that adjust to a certain % over libor or prime.   READ YOUR NOTE and if you don't understand it have an Attorney read it.. along with your mortgage those are usually 10 pages or so long..  And of course you will have your personal gurantee doc those are the three you need to read and fully understand.

Just like people think they can get a heloc like its a 30 mortgage when in fact they can BE called or frozen at ANYTIME at the sole discretion of the lender..  these are just things to be aware of .. and fully informed 

 Thanks for the heads up. The loan is just in discussion phase right now with a loan officer so no formal document has been drafted at the moment? Do you have any advice of how to pose this question to the loan officer to determine if this is the scenario with the loan I am looking at currently? Would you recommend looking into other loan options at this point?

Originally posted by @Jay Hinrichs:

what your seeking does not really exist in the market place..  and your on the right track to limit your loans on rentals that have 5 year calls.. those types of loans sunk a lot of investors last GFC  when their loans were called and credit was frozen.. lots of perfectly performing properties were lost.

Jay when you suggest that these 5 year "reset" (i.e. as the bank had referred to them) that there was were an issue that instead of providing a modified interest rate they literally did not approve the loan at all? This was not explained to me by the loan officer.

Jared

Currently working with a lender that is similar to Aj. It is 5.4% with a 5 year reset. I think they offer out to 30 but I am only going with a 10 year so didn't investigate it that much. The loan will be for the LLC with which will allow us to deed the to the LLC. I personally was really hoping to do a HELOC but at the moment the COFR through this bank was the only one I could find willing to loan to an LLC with our current experience (i.e. basically 0 operating history).

I am currently looking at options for financing after a cash purchase. The finance would account for $30k which should be around 50-60% LTV depending on what the appraisal comes back at. The following are the (2) I have found at the moment. Do either of them sound typical or like good deals or should I keep looking?

Option 1:

Personal HELOC through Credit Union at 4.85% for 10 year loan

No application or appraisal fees

The deed can't be quitclaim to LLC

Fixed Interest Rate

Option 2: 

Cash Out Refinance through commercial bank at 5.4% for 10 year loan

Estimate fees at $725

The loan and deed will be issued to LLC

The interest rate resets every 5 years

At the moment the net difference is about $1500 over the course of the loan in which one is issued to the LLC and the other is issued to one of the members of the LLC through a personal note. Based on research neither seemed like bad options but wanted to hopefully get advice from someone who has done this more than myself.

Also any advice on where I could find better rates is appreciated.

Originally posted by @Nicholas Aiola:

@Jeremy England This is fine. It is common to have a separate LLC serve as the operating LLC while the asset (property) is held outside of the operating LLC. If you're the sole member of the LLC, it won't matter - all activity will be reported on your personal income tax return anyway; no separate return will have to be filed for the LLC.

Also, some of those rehab costs may be able to be expensed in full instead of capitalized and depreciated. This depends on when your property was placed in service in relation to when the rehab costs were incurred, and on the nature of the expenses.

I would recommend consulting with your CPA to make sure your tax deductions are being maximized to the fullest.

In your statement above you suggest the case of a sole member LLC. What if the same scenario was related to a multi member LLC in which the (asset) was deeded to (2) of the (3) members and not the LLC. Would this be handled on the LLC tax return or the individuals.

A second question would be if the property has not been rented but instead was in Rehab for the portion of this year would this even be considered a "rental"? And if so would the individuals claim the rehab costs or the LLC?

A third question would be if the property has not acquired any actual income since it has not been rented as of yet would the LLC have to complete an income tax return since they have not actually made any income?

Thanks in advance for any answers.

I am currently in a LLC with (2) other partners. Our first house purchase was a cash purchase done prior to the LLC being formed so the deed was drafted in (2) of the (3) partners name at the time (i.e. dumb decision now that I realize it). We looked to transfer the deed into the LLC but realized that was going to cost quite a bit of money so decided to forgo that at the moment. This being said now that the LLC has been established I have been reading a lot of threads and have noticed quite a bit of conflict with people suggesting they struggle to get loans and insurance through the LLC versus an individual. This is what my questions focus around:

1. For the existing property should we be looking to transfer this in the LLC immediately? As background once the rehab is done we were hoping to pull a LOC or CORF on the property.

2. For future properties are we better to make our cash offers as an individual or as the LLC? Similar to above we would plan to LOC or COFR to pull the cash back out to make another purchase.

3. For future properties should we be looking to deed the properties in the LLC or through one of the three individuals in the LLC?

4. It is my understanding that we can't get a standard conventional mortgage through an LLC. Will a bank usually give a conventional mortgage on rental properties and if so should this be the route we are looking is to take loans out individually between the 3 of us? (i.e. If I have $18k of working capital to hold in a property do I buy 3 $30K houses on a conventional loan or try to put the $18k at 1 house and COFR to get the 75% LTV assuming it is $30k+)

Bump....? Not sure if this is allowed lol just see that threads get buried quickly.