I completely realize that you can search on the forums and such and look up what people are saying, but I have noticed a trend in my searches that indicate an extreme bias against being a Guru.
Now we all know the world of money is rife with cons and charlatan's. But like colleges, the bad diploma mills should never give a legitimate college a 'bad rep' as though the concept of colleges is the issue.
When anyone seems to defend a guru, they are called affiliates or even probed to discover if they are an 'affiliate'. So very few people are likely to stick their heads up and defend a Guru for fear of losing their ability to network here.
To give a real world example, before I was Christian I would ignore any Christian's assessment of Christianity. I was foolish as obviously anyone that would have affirmed Christianity then became a Christian. I would even go so far to ignore pastors as profiteers ignoring the reality they could actually believe it or defend it, after all they made their living off the money. But we know that little profit is gained by a pastor, despite the ones that give over 500,000 a bad name.
The same relationship is here. A person who uses the Guru, becomes the Guru's proponent and may even profit off of the relationship, does nothing to detract from the fact they have used it successfully and can defend the program with intimate knowledge.
If there is a heated bigotry against such programs very few are going to poke their heads out and that will only result in a lopsided forum post or blog.
Just some food for thought. Hopefully disagreeing and using real world examples will not get me banned.