Originally posted by @Lee S.:
it seems that HVA franchisee's like to state "facts" without having the actual data to back up those facts or the logic to realize that they couldn't possibly back up said claimed "facts" with data because there is no data on individual investor results. Sure sounds good to the shallow thinkers though.
Sure is convenient to tell the "failed solo investor story" and compare it to the "successful franchisee investor" to make things sound rosy.
This is my major issue with what is said in this thread. I get that some people feel they need the hand holding and coaching and education is valuable, I've paid for some myself. But to make ridiculous claims based on facts you can't possibly know does not shine brightly on the company.
There are plenty of investors killing it that started their business from the ground up with no "brand name". This fact alone disputes everything claimed by HVA franchisees. I'm also going to go out on a limb and assume that less than 100% of franchisees have been successful and are still in the business. Oops, Logic fail number 2.
Bring the data or silence the claims.
Wow Lee, Im sorry you feel this way about us, and can't speak for other posts, but I actually don't see any actual facts in mine, so not quite sure what your referencing in your post?
I never stated that things were always "rosy" nor did I mention that 100% of the franchisees are successful, so would ask you to reevaluate what I wrote and please don't make judgement by what you may have heard or seen in the past. I can say that we do certainly have information, facts and figures that can show you potential over time based on ad spend in a given area. Obviously some of this will depend on your own business model and personality, but there is a path you can work toward.
Reality is its not all "rosy" anywhere in this industry, but for me the amount that I pay is more than with the benefits it provides, and apparently also for 700 other franchisees.
Yes, by all means, go ahead and create a company on your own, I'm not saying you shouldn't, and I'm trying to imply that HomeVestors, or any other franchise for that matter, is appropriate for everyone. Im simply responding to a post questioning whether HomeVestors and their "We Buy Ugly Houses" brand is a worthwhile investment, and more than happy to discuss further with those that may feel the national team environment and open share of ideas an support is worth the franchise cost. Or maybe the person thats looking for an easier, and cheaper way to fund flips; we have an in house lending institution and simple, super fast, funding process. Or maybe that investor that is actually frustrated with the amount of time it takes to target advertise themselves; we have an impressive direct mail program, currently running national TV ads, and most areas we already have billboards in place. Maybe, like for me, Id rather walk into a house and be associated with a company that has bought over 70k houses with obvious brand recognition and be able to talk openly and honestly about the sellers issues to see if were a fit; instead of forcing some kind of awkward sales spiel (not saying all non-HomeVestors guys do this, but it is highly prevalent from what Ive seen and not for me)
You see the benefit of HomeVestors is different for everyone and I would never tell someone that its a one size fits all box. I got it, your not interested in the Franchise model, totally fine and I'm not upset. Id hope you would be able to work with HomeVestors guys at some point for the benefit of both parties.
Ive been very happy with the brand and the family I have bought into, and always excited to talk to others about how Homevestors has changed my life for the better.