@Priyanka B.
Hi there! I’m an agent here in Sacramento, and know the area pretty well. This a market that generally won’t have cash flow (on year one) unless you are putting a lot more than 20% down. But it is definitely a market that has had lot of appreciation historically.
When we look at numbers, we look at how the property performs over its first three to five years. For those putting 20% down, it's pretty common to see negative monthly cash flow of about 150-200 on year one. That's with 5% vacancy, 5% for CapEx and about 6% for property management.
Right now the max rent increase is 6%. So if your property is charging market rents, it’s usually negative 150-200 the first year and then neutral to low cash flow in year two or three. If it’s already tenant occupied, they are rarely charging market rate, so the figures will be worse.
You still get all the tax benefits of depreciation, interest write offs, etc. and the value of the home likely increasing.
Usually when you see areas that have higher cash flow than that, they are the areas that tend to have more headaches or require more attention. So generally, we look at it like a spectrum: one side is more passive and less headaches, but has less cash flow. The other side requires more attention, but the ROI and cash flow are better.
If you want the less work and less cash flow option, I would look at areas like Folsom, Roseville, Rocklin and some neighborhoods in Sacramento.
The areas that are likely more work, but higher cash flow would be most of Citrus Heights, Antelope and some parts of Rancho Cordova and Sacramento.
Sorry this was long winded, but hopefully it helps. Good luck!