When I wrote that criteria yesterday I did not give proper time to form what I was looking for in criteria.
Please let me differentiate between what I would ‘like’ and what I would ‘require’. Sorry for the confusion and thank you to all who helped show me the errors of my post.
I understand my criteria is high. I am flexible on some things. Really, the only things not flexible would be:
*background/credit checks on anyone over 18 and they be on the lease.
*rental history of at least a few years and not just current landlord
*income 3 times rent so they do not over extend themselves
One mistake that was pointed out from someone else was the the implication I was looking for 5 years employment history, which makes little sense. I only need that income verified to be 3 times the rent a amount. Sorry for not being clear about that. Also a 620 might be high for that area. That is something I would leave to the PM as he knows the market far better than I do.
And, as all PM companies know their leases better than I do and as such can better enforce them, I have no problems with their leases. I would want to see it, but would most likely be ok with what they had.
I am sorry for not being clear with what I would ‘like’ and what I would ‘require’.
Thanks again for everyone’s input. It is very much appreciated.