Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties. Try BiggerPockets PRO.
x
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: George Gammon

George Gammon has started 15 posts and replied 172 times.

Post: Pitfalls to Turn Key Rental Properties

George GammonPosted
  • Flipper/Rehabber
  • Las Vegas, NV
  • Posts 174
  • Votes 251
Originally posted by @Account Closed:

@George Gammon I appreciate the information you have come up with.  Our leasing team has no trouble renting out in Ruskin, even with the competition. I would assume it's because we provide better quality rehabs and more amenities.  We have also sold to home buyers in the area so you are false when you assume "zero demand from owner occupants there".  

I agree with you, real prices are important. But again, I think it would be safe for you to agree that not all investors have the same goals as yourself.  I always recommend a mixed portfolio of homes but like Mike said, there's not a huge demand for rent $1,200+. 

We have a lot of inventory in Blue Springs, Lees Summit, Raytown, Independence, Grandview and Kansas City.  

Forgive me Machaylee but I'm skeptical.  You have "no trouble renting in Ruskin?" Seems hard to believe in an area that has multiple vacancies on every street regardless of the quality of rehab (how much rehab can be done and still sell a house for 50K?  It maybe possible you and I have different definitions of "no trouble." 

Regarding the owner occupants I'm even more skeptical.  I don't know of a bank in KC that will lend in that area, on a house under 75k.  Maybe I just haven't met with the right bank?  But assuming that's the case, the "owner occupants" you're selling to maybe just have 50k in cash saved up?  I find that incredibly difficult to believe.  

You recommend a mixed portfolio of homes.  What are your qualifications for making recommendations?  My intent is not to be rude but to ask an valid question.  A question that I think is extremely reasonable considering your statement "there's not huge demand for rent $1,200+."  This just isn't true.  All my properties, and every other local investors I know, in that range rent within days with current rent increases.  

To further the point. According to your website, you have 1 house for sale in Blue Springs, 1 in Lees Summit where rents are 1200+.  This is because theres an incredible amount of local investor demand there and inventory is very hard to find, not because the rental market for $1,200+ is soft, quite the opposite...Let's be honest.  

I'd also like to point out, according to your website, you have 1 house for sale in Blue Springs, 1 house for sale in Lees Summit (maybe we have a different definition of "a lot?") and 34 houses for sale in or around Ruskin area where maintenance and evictions will be far more likely...see above post.  

Post: Pitfalls to Turn Key Rental Properties

George GammonPosted
  • Flipper/Rehabber
  • Las Vegas, NV
  • Posts 174
  • Votes 251

@Mike D'Arrigo @Account Closed

Both of you say all investors don't have the same goals.  I agree.  But I think it's safe to say all investors do share the goal of not losing money.  

My point isn't about investors preferring A, B or C areas, it's that most turnkey providers are selling inventory that wouldn't sell well, or at the same price, on the open market.  AND most buyers of turnkey properties aren't factoring in real depreciation into their numbers or the fact that they're buying into an area that is saturated with rentals (or will be soon.)  The later is by no means the fault of the turnkey provider, it's the buyers responsibility to educate themselves.  

I do think that turnkey providers occasionally have inventory in areas that have more tailwind than headwind, regardless of A, B, C, but they're far and few between in a sellers market (in a buyers market it's different.)  It's up to the buyer to know enough to select the right properties and understand the interests of the turnkey provider may not be aligned with their own.  

I think it would behove investors to ask themselves "why is this turnkey provider selling me this property instead of putting it on the MLS and opening it up to countless buyers that could potentially offer a price higher than what's listed?" Or said another way, if you owned a great rental in a great area would you A. put it on the MLS and see how high a price you can get or B. Sell it at a set price to one buyer? Assuming the set price isn't higher than the market price why wouldn't you put it on the MLS and see how high of a price you can get?

Selling at a set price to an investor without trying to sell it on the open market first doesn't make a lot of sense, so why are they doing it?  

I'm currently in the KC market all day every day.  I've bought and sold well over a million dollars of property here, in the past few years, just investing for myself.  (And by the way, I own property in A, B and C neighborhoods so it's not that I'm bias towards A or B properties.  Theres good C areas with more tailwind and bad C areas with tremendous headwind)  I can tell you from boots on the ground experience KC investors are tripping over themselves to buy good properties in good areas regardless of A, B, or C.  The key phrase there being "good properties" in "good areas."

Just last week I looked at a property in a good B area that would've been a great rehab/rental. I went to look at it within an hour of hitting the MLS and there were 5 other people looking at it when I got there. I submitted my offer that day and my agent said they'd already received over 10 offers and I'd need to submit a "highest and best offer." I offered 10k over the asking price...I wasn't even close. It sold for 20k+ over asking price of 50k. At that buy price there would've been little to no margin in the rehab for a flip so most likely a local investor was buying it to rent and was happy with 5k in built in equity.

My point is local investors are so hungry for deals, and yield, they're paying high prices and falling over themselves to do so.  Why then would a turnkey provider sell a property at a set price to an out of state investor if they could flip it to a local investor in 30 minutes and potentially have a bidding war?  

Is it possible the turnkey providers are selling inventory that local investors just don't want or at a price local investors aren't willing to pay?  It's the job of the investors to dig into these questions.

Another thing investors need to understand, and think through, is the business model of property management.  

As an example: Let's say a property manager runs 400 properties and that requires 1 employee per 100 properties (probably conservative.)  This hypothetical company would have 4 employees, maybe a receptionist, a full time maintenance person and let's say a leasing agent...6 or 7 employees total.  Let's assume these employees make 36k a year so that's 3k a month.  Total payroll would be around 20k per month.  Then they need an office, another 2k a month and phones, internet, computers, fax, banking, office supplies, insurance, vehicles, misc. legal and accounting fees etc.  As someone who was an entrepreneur for 15 years, running countless businesses of all types, I'd say their fixed expenses are between 27k and 32k a month.  

Remember our hypothetical property manager manages 400 properties, at 8% of gross rents collected.  Let's assume they're in KC and the average rent collected is $1000 a month...That's 32,000 a month in revenue for a company that has 27,000 to 32,000 a month in expenses.  Not exactly a cash cow.  

Thinking through this it's easy to see how a property manager most likely won't make profit on the 8% fee, that just covers the monthly nut, but on up charging for maintenance and evictions.  

I'd then pose the question to investors "Is it remotely possible some turnkey providers (offering property management), that sell the majority of their properties in unattractive areas, where maintenance and evictions are a much bigger issue, do so because the money is made on the maintenance and evictions?"  And if the money's made on maintenance and evictions that means it'll be tough for the investor the type of return they're hoping for.  I'm not implying they charge investors for un needed maintenance, I'm saying these properties will be prone to maintenance issues because of the area and type of tenant and some turnkey providers bank on this.  

To me, the take away is many turnkey providers wouldn't sell to out of state investors if they weren't getting higher than market prices up front or planning on making it up on the back end with excessive maintenance and evictions.  

When you consider that, along with the likely depreciation of the asset and excessive rental supply in many of the turnkey areas it's prudent for investors to proceed with caution.  

Hopefully it's obvious I've refrained from mentioning any turnkey providers.  In the first post I went so far is to not even mention the city.  My goal isn't to throw turnkey providers under the bus (again, occasionally they will have some great inventory) it's to encourage investors to educate themselves better, think through the business model and use this to your advantage to make sure you're buying a property that fits your needs and wants exactly.  

Post: Pitfalls to Turn Key Rental Properties

George GammonPosted
  • Flipper/Rehabber
  • Las Vegas, NV
  • Posts 174
  • Votes 251
Originally posted by @Account Closed:

I find this interesting as I sell many properties in both areas mentioned here.  As a turnkey provider, we offer properties in all areas A, B and C and describe them as such. A grade - mostly homeowners, newer homes. B grade - mix of home owners and renters. C grade- mostly renters, older homes.  Based off of that description and investors expectations/goals, I can point them to an investment that is right for them.  Not everyone is financially ready for the high priced A grade rental. The upside of owning many rental homes in one area like the one mentioned in the first picture (Ruskin) is that you can screen all of the tenants very thoroughly and stay very in tune with the market as a whole. I have continuously watched the homes in this particular area appreciate by tens of thousands in the past couple years alone. I'd love to hear more of your thoughts!

 First Mackaylee, I appreciate your feedback.  I have no doubt that the A, B and C descriptions of each property are fully disclosed.  What I'm not sure of is if investors, who purchase these properties, know the amount of rental inventory that's around where they're buying or the fact that their property will most likely depreciate in real terms.  This is a huge part of the analysis of a property most overlook.  Let's use Ruskin as an example.  

A turnkey provider could sell a property there for 50k that has a market rent of 800 a month...great return.  But what's the chance of getting it rented consistently when there's literally 30 others, exactly like what you just purchased, for rent within walking distance?  It's like buying an apartment in a 300 unit apartment building that has 50 vacancies.  

Your correct, not everyone is financially ready for a grade A rental but everyone should be financially educated enough to not put their hard earned money at excessive risk.  Imagine the investor that only has 10k to his or her name use it to buy a property in Ruskin and desperately need the monthly rent to make the mortgage payment.  How realistic is that going to be if there 30 other identical homes vacant in the same neighborhood?  Look at the rental price difference in the photo above.  You know as well as I do those homes are all extremely similar in size and floor plan.  What's happening is investors who bought there are desperate so they drop their rents and forgo maintenance.  Not a good position for a newby who isn't ready for a "high priced grade A rental."  

Again, my point is they know the obvious pro's and con's but are oblivious to the rental inventory they're buying into.  I can't imagine anyone buying there after seeing how much rental inventory is already there and currently vacant.  Would you put your money to work in Ruskin? 

Next is the issue of appreciation.  On this point you're 1. incorrect about prices increasing and 2. looking at nominal prices not real prices.  

Regarding nominal prices they've not increased in the last 2 years.  In fact they haven't increased in 4 years since the bottom of the market in 2012.  I know this well because I started investing in this market heavily in 2012.  I analyzed the Ruskin area extensively for months.  At the end of 2012 you could buy a normal 3 bed 2 bath for the same price you can get it for now.  This makes sense because how could prices increase?  In order for this to happen there'd have to be demand.  What investor is going to buy there knowing the area and existing rental inventory?...very few.  And you know as well as I do there's zero demand from owner occupants there.  Even if you wanted to buy and live in the area you'd go over to Grand View or up closer to Raytown.  

And real prices are what most investors overlook but are most important.  The question isn't "what's the price then and now?" but how much purchasing power did I have then and how much do I have now.  Using Ruskin again for an example:  As you know, most of those homes were built around 1960.  Around that time you could've purchased a house for about 15k.  Now you could buy that same home for 50k, almost a 300% increase...in nominal terms.  This doesn't mean you have 300% more purchasing power, which is all that matters.  In 1960 15k had the purchasing power of 122k in todays dollars.  So in terms of purchasing power, which again, is all that matters.  That home depreciated by over 50%.  This is what very few investors, if any I've seen, consider when buying homes from turnkey providers...they see, and are sold, a 300% gain when in reality they've taken a 50% loss.  

Those are some of my thoughts.  I'm curious how much inventory your company currently has for sale in Lees Summit or Blue Springs?    

Post: Pitfalls to Turn Key Rental Properties

George GammonPosted
  • Flipper/Rehabber
  • Las Vegas, NV
  • Posts 174
  • Votes 251

I've been surprised by how many people are getting ripped off by turnkey rental providers. Most without even knowing they're getting ripped off. Granted, there some providers that are good but many aren't. The question always has to be asked "why would a provider not just sell their inventory on the MLS?" Wouldn't there be a bigger pool of buyers and therefore potentially a higher price?

What's most shocking is how buyers overlook key issues.  Such as the depreciation in real dollars "adjusted for inflation" or rentability of a property.  This is a zillow snap shot of two areas in a market where I have several properties.  The first is a hot spot for turnkey providers and second is not (the second is where I prefer to buy.) 

Basically the same sized area, both all single family homes.  The first area is where a provider can advertise high yields but very few owner occupants will buy there.  The second is very desirable for owner occupants and homes sell and rent very quickly.  Where would you rather own a rental?

The turn key provider can buy a lot more inventory in the first area, mark it up and still sell it to investors.  In the second area turn key providers can't get inventory because the markets hot and it's desirable.  How many turn key buyers think or want to be invested in area two but unbeknownst to them are investing in area one?  

Put yourself in the shoes of the turnkey provider.  Where are you going to make more money?  Said another way, where do you have to sell in order to stay in business when it's a sellers market (today.) 

I'm considering writing an ebook on what to look for when considering out of state turnkey investments.  I'd love to hear from investors considering this path and what their concerns are about turnkey investing so I could address these concerns in the ebook.  

Thank you,

George

Post: Forbes "Signs of Real Estate Bubble"

George GammonPosted
  • Flipper/Rehabber
  • Las Vegas, NV
  • Posts 174
  • Votes 251

Forbes gives opinion on "signs your local market is in a real estate bubble." 

http://www.forbes.com/sites/trulia/2016/11/15/sign...

1.  Shaky Loans

2.  High Leverage 

3.  Prices Increasing Faster Than Wages

4.  Foreign Demand Slows

5.  Interest Rate Rise

6.  Public Oblivious to Bubble

I won't include my opinion.  But I think it's wise for investors to be cognizant of macro conditions.  

Post: Googles HUGE Red Flag to REI's

George GammonPosted
  • Flipper/Rehabber
  • Las Vegas, NV
  • Posts 174
  • Votes 251

@JD Martin @Mike Cumbie @Shane Woods

Google search for "Cash out refinance"

Google search for "How to buy gold"

Gold prices literally peaked the exact same month as the Google searches.

Google search for "Buy Bitcoin"

Again, price of BItcoin peaks the exact same month.  

Obviously if more people want to take an action there will be more searches.  It makes sense that those actions would be expressed through more buying or higher prices.  I think what's important to note is if levels of prices or in this case searches get to the same level as where prices crashed before.  

It may mean something, it may mean nothing but I think it's worth knowing.  

Post: Googles HUGE Red Flag to REI's

George GammonPosted
  • Flipper/Rehabber
  • Las Vegas, NV
  • Posts 174
  • Votes 251
Originally posted by @JD Martin:

How many more people use Google in 2016 than 2007?

You know, looking up the word "Apocalypse" shows that searches peaked in May 2016 and has declined steeply since then. "Economic crash" spikes hard in 2015. "Zombies" was way back in 2013. How about "secession"? Monster spike right at the 2012 election. None of that stuff came true. I guess Google's not as good of a prognostication service as one might think. 

None of those correlated with an actual event(s).  The Google search "flip house" did.  I'm not saying it has anything to do with anything, I am saying it's information worth knowing.  

Post: Googles HUGE Red Flag to REI's

George GammonPosted
  • Flipper/Rehabber
  • Las Vegas, NV
  • Posts 174
  • Votes 251

This is a chart of the term "flip houses" being entered into Google.  It peaks in July, 2007 (the worst time to buy) and bottoms in Sept., 2011 (the best time to buy).  It's now at levels approaching 2007.  

Post: Over leveraged

George GammonPosted
  • Flipper/Rehabber
  • Las Vegas, NV
  • Posts 174
  • Votes 251

@David Ptak @Russell Brazil

Russel we're on the same page.  

So David, the take away is if your monthly mortgage payment (debt) is higher than your monthly cash flow (income), then you'll eventually get capped out.  If on the other hand, your cash flow (excluding debt payment) from the property is at least 125% of the the debt payment, then you should be able to scale with out a borrowing issue.  

Post: Over leveraged

George GammonPosted
  • Flipper/Rehabber
  • Las Vegas, NV
  • Posts 174
  • Votes 251
Originally posted by @Russell Brazil:

With each subsequent property you buy it becomes easier to buy the next one quicker because you continue to acquire income producing assets. Let's say you are able to save $10,000 a year on your own. You buy a property that throws off $5,000 in cash. Now you can save $15,000 in a year. You buy property 2 and 3 at the same levels and then you are saving $20,000 and then $25,000 in a year and it just snowballs from there. The key is to reinvest that cash and not spend it.

Russell your income increases in your hypothetical but so does you're debt.  It does become "easier" because you have more income to save.  But doesn't it become harder from the stand point of your debt to income ratio?  (assuming your debt payment is greater than the monthly cash flow)