Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here
Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties. Try BiggerPockets PRO.
x
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Eric Williams

Eric Williams has started 22 posts and replied 147 times.


 Actually yeah they are all over the place, and you would know that if you put in the research and read just even one BNA Portfolio.

But continue being smug to people who are asking for help.

"In determining the amount of reasonable compensation under §162(a)(1), it is necessary to consider both the amount of deferred and nondeferred compensation. 606 The Tax Court and several Courts of Appeals have adopted five factors in determining the reasonableness of compensation:...

The Second and Ninth Circuits have held that the reasonableness of compensation must be assessed from the perspective of a hypothetical or independent investor, not as a separate autonomous factor but instead as “a lens through which the entire analysis should be viewed,” and requiring the application of four factors:

Quote from @Eamonn McElroy:

(1) The IRS has taken no such position.  You're welcome to provide a link that reinforces your statement.

(2) I'm much less concerned about what position the IRS takes than what position my clients can support under authoritative guidance.  IRC Sec 1402 and the related Treasury regs govern income subject to SE taxes.

(3) No such thing as "active" income in the context of IRC Sec 1402 and 469.

Again, most Airbnb and VRBO belong on Sch E and are not subject to SE taxes.  Consult your tax advisor.

You realize all I literally had to do was Google "irs airbnb active", scroll down and find their position in a Memorandum.

Strong language makes weak arguments but you missed that lesson. I guess you also decided other people should back their claims while you pretend you have some idea what you're saying.

"In IRS Chief Counsel Memorandum 202151005 (Dec. 23, 2021), the IRS evaluated two “general” fact patterns for short-term rental arrangements. In the first example, the owner rented out a fully-furnished vacation property through an online rental marketplace. The owner provided linens, kitchen utensils, and various other items to make the property fully habitable for occupants. The owner also provided daily cleaning services, access to dedicated Wi-Fi, access to beach and recreational equipment, and prepaid ride-share vouchers between the rental property and the nearest business district. Although the owner provided significant items and services to guests, they were of a type that is not unusual or extraordinary for the online rental marketplace.

The IRS concluded that the net rental income from this example constituted “Net Earnings from Self Employment (“NESE”)







Post: MAGI and Active Real Estate Losses

Eric WilliamsPosted
  • Accountant
  • Houston, TX
  • Posts 147
  • Votes 41
Quote from @Nick Wiget:

I'm trying to understand whether Active real estate losses (Real Estate Professional) lowers MAGI. My understanding is these active losses will lower Adjusted Gross Income (line 11 of a 1040) but there's some confusing language that rental losses should be added back to AGI to get to MAGI. The context here is trying to understand whether these losses will lower MAGI to a point where my wife and I can contribute to a ROTH IRA. Anyone have a clear answer here?

Thanks!


The reason is that active participation is a special level of participation under 469 which falls under 469 while real estate professional are exempt from the passive loss rules so they add that back to separate them for their respective treatment.

Honestly it probably doesn't apply.

Post: Tax help: Selling house with handshake equity agreement

Eric WilliamsPosted
  • Accountant
  • Houston, TX
  • Posts 147
  • Votes 41
Quote from @Palmer Thomas:

I have a rental house I'm in the process of selling.  When I first purchased the house, it needed a lot of work.  I have a friend who is good at doing just that so I agreed that I would give him an equity stake in the house to match the percentage of the value of work he did.  After rehab, he now owns 30% of the property.

Since this was a house I purchased in the beginning of my real estate adventures, I had no idea about long term tax implications. I didn't put him on either the title or put him as a member of the LLC under which the property is owned. There is no paperwork at all drawing up the agreement. It was just a friend to friend handshake deal. From a combination of the rehab and appreciation the house value has gone from roughly $50k to $200k.

How can I get my friend his share of the profit without being double taxed (I pay taxes on sale then he pays taxes when I give him his share) all while trying to do a 1031 exchange with my portion of the sale?

He should have been taxed in the year the services were provided equal to the fair market value of the property received. 

You would have a deduction for that same value.

Instead you created a partnership with its own filing requirements, and potential liabilities. If he did have an equity interest he would have been receiving a distributive share equal to that interest every year. If he didn't, you got taxed on income that should have gone to him. 

I mean at this point it might be easier to just give him his share of the RECOGNIZED GAIN (those words are critical).

Yeah honestly you don't need paperwork to create a partnership at any level, for better or worse - substance over form.

On top of that you violated 721 and made it a taxable transfer.

1.61-2

(d) Compensation paid other than in cash—(1) In general. Except as otherwise provided in paragraph (d)(6)(i) of this section (relating to certain property transferred after June 30, 1969), if services are paid for in property, the fair market value of the property taken in payment must be included in income as compensation.

Post: $750,000 in back taxes due

Eric WilliamsPosted
  • Accountant
  • Houston, TX
  • Posts 147
  • Votes 41
Quote from @Rick Pozos:

If it was inherited a long time ago, it will still have a steep tax hit. 

Grandma bought 20 acres way out of town for 10k 50 years ago. The town started moving that way. She past away 30 years ago and the value was 40k. Now it is prime suburban property worth $3mil!!

Get a smaller house quick before there is an IRS lien. Pay some money down on the 750k and make a big pmt plan.


 Dude your best course of action is to tell this dude to get an attorney because they're gonna put a lien on all his ****, and levy the **** out if it. Dead serious.

Post: Help! I just got blown away by my tax bill

Eric WilliamsPosted
  • Accountant
  • Houston, TX
  • Posts 147
  • Votes 41

The installment plan might be available, but do not default on any payments because they will terminate and assess accordingly. 

Here is a link:

IRS payment plan options – Fast, easy and secure | Internal Revenue Service

Long-term payment plan (also called an installment agreement) – For taxpayers who have a total balance less than $50,000 in combined tax, penalties and interest. They can make monthly payments for up to 72 months. Taxpayers are encouraged to set up plan payments using direct debit (automatic bank withdraw), which eliminates the need to send a payment each month, saves postage costs, and reduces the chance of default. The IRS requires direct debit for balances between $25,000 and $50,000.

Quote from @Phyo Ko:

Hello everyone, 

I am in the market for a new CPA to help me with setting up business structure and prepare for my tax return next year. I have talk to a couple of different companies but all of them left me feeling over sold and not in good hands. I am hoping to get a unbiased opinion to see if I am just being overly cautious.  

I am currently in military stationed in CA and will be moving to FL end of the year. I have a duplex that's rented out right now and a SFH that I plan to start renting out Jan24. I plan to get my real estate license in FL while I get into fixing and flipping in fl. I want to set a good structure in place for my properties in CA and what I plan to do in FL. Also I want to set up LLC for my wife who has a side business that picking up a lot of traction.

The CPA I have talked to have recommended different approaches on how I should set everything up. One has me putting the CA properties into a LLC with a WY holding LLC owned by a Living Trust then a separate LLC holding company for me and my wife business. Another one has me placing my CA properties into statutory trust-LLC-Land-Wy holding LLC- Living trust and me and my wife separate LLC with a LLC holding company taxes a C corp. I am lost with all the different holding company and trust do I really need all of this complexity? Do I really need a Wyoming LLC, statutory trust and etc? Can I just by with a LLC for my two rental and two llc for myself and my wife? I am still taking my first step I feel like this is over kill. Thank in advance for any advice.

So that organizational structure is going to cost how much up front, and how much each year in time and money. They didn't mention the idea of opportunity costs, because I want you to add those amounts up and brainstorm all the ways you can never spend it once you commit.

Ask them how much it will cost to make sure that living/revocable trust will cost to structure so when it becomes irrevocable all transfers are carried out correctly. Estate attorneys are not ****ing cheap. 

Ask them how many separate bank accounts that will require, and how much separate accounting it will require to prevent commingling of funds and piercing of the veil.

I want you to ask them if you could accomplish the same transfer with a Joint Tenancy in Common WROS (With Rights of Survivorship), if they say yes, ask why they didn't suggest that instead, or tell you it's likely under state law all your assets are getting transferred to your wife anyways, for ****ing free.

Ask them how an active trade or business can be a holding company? What is it holding? No offense but holding companies often serve purposes like finance acquisition or management services for affiliates.

Dude honestly I read the second scenario and it was so dumb I honesly have to pass. You and your wife have separate LLCs? Ask them if that creates a partnership under Federal or state tax law. Tell me their answer because whatever they say will not be based on Luna, 301.7701, 7701, or anything that resembles someone who won't give you a blank stare before pretending to know.

Remember, taxes are a hidden value good/service. That means when you pay me, truthfully, you don't have the skillset to tell me whether or not I did a good job, and they know it.

Quote from @Willie Holdman:

In 2022 I sold my home I lived in for over 2 years. I used half the home for business. I took the 250,000 deduction, and used the remaining profits on the home to do a 1031 exchange. I overlooked that I still owed a mortgage on the home that was paid off. I believe it was 360,000. For some reason it never registered that I would be required to pay capitol gains tax on the debt outstanding on the home that was paid off. When I noticed this was when on my tax return it says I owe a substantial amount of capitol gains to the feds and the state. Huge blow! But upon researching, it seems if your income was below 41,675 you don't have to pay capitol gains tax https://www.irs.gov/taxtopics/tc409 What are the stipulations?

 It's not that you're paying capital gains tax on the debt outstandings, it's that liability relief increases the amount realized which in turn increases the gain.

Use this spreadsheet to get an idea.

excel1040.com

Also are you saying you used a personal residence to do the 1031?

Post: Mortgage loan from mom - 1099-INT?

Eric WilliamsPosted
  • Accountant
  • Houston, TX
  • Posts 147
  • Votes 41
Quote from @Michael Plaks:
Quote from @Eric Williams:
Quote from @Michael Plaks:

Assuming that the child uses this mortgage for business purposes, i.e. buying a rental property - the child has to send Mom form 1099-Int if the annual interest on this loan is above $600.

 I think it may be lower, if one is willing to entertain an alternative viewpoint:

$10 rule is in Sec. 6049

Sec. 6049 (b) (2)

(2) Exceptions
For purposes of subsection (a), the term “interest” does not include—
(A) interest on any obligation issued by a natural person


 Well there ya go I learned something, gracias.

Quote from @Phyo Ko:

Hello everyone, 

I am in the market for a new CPA to help me with setting up business structure and prepare for my tax return next year. I have talk to a couple of different companies but all of them left me feeling over sold and not in good hands. I am hoping to get a unbiased opinion to see if I am just being overly cautious.  

I am currently in military stationed in CA and will be moving to FL end of the year. I have a duplex that's rented out right now and a SFH that I plan to start renting out Jan24. I plan to get my real estate license in FL while I get into fixing and flipping in fl. I want to set a good structure in place for my properties in CA and what I plan to do in FL. Also I want to set up LLC for my wife who has a side business that picking up a lot of traction.

The CPA I have talked to have recommended different approaches on how I should set everything up. One has me putting the CA properties into a LLC with a WY holding LLC owned by a Living Trust then a separate LLC holding company for me and my wife business. Another one has me placing my CA properties into statutory trust-LLC-Land-Wy holding LLC- Living trust and me and my wife separate LLC with a LLC holding company taxes a C corp. I am lost with all the different holding company and trust do I really need all of this complexity? Do I really need a Wyoming LLC, statutory trust and etc? Can I just by with a LLC for my two rental and two llc for myself and my wife? I am still taking my first step I feel like this is over kill. Thank in advance for any advice.


 I'm a vet hit me up. Also a CPA two masters.