Originally posted by @Mike Palmer:
@Richard C., @Patrick Donovan:
I don't think your numbers are very accurate for our area and this property in particular. As an area we are running under 5% vacancy right now (I think last year was 3%, and has been under 4% for the last 3 years consecutively). My properties personally have virtually zero vacancy (over the last 4 years I have less than one week total for all units combined, which includes 3 tenant turnovers).
I would also wager maintenance, repairs, and capex at more like 10% total on this place (assuming the HOA takes care of the yard and exterior structure/maintenance).
He also lives virtually next door, so paying 10% for management would be silly. He should be able to manage this place with very little time or cost.
I only run the numbers say property management at 10% simply because in the future if I am unable to manage the property, say I have to many, get hurt/sick, or something like that, then it would be accounted for since most property management that I have looked into or heard of charge somewhere between 8-10%.
As for the vacancy I completely understand that I guess I could have looked into that more before I said that. I just go for the 8% so I know I am not going to lose on it.
And cap ex and maintenance I go that high even if things are new just to make sure I cover my a**. I don't want to push that money into something else and not have any in reserves. But with all the improvements on the property I can see why you can rate that so low.
I appreciate the insight and constructive criticism, makes me think a little more clearly about my numbers.