Hey @Matthew Leal, the way I would structure this if it were a flip, with me being the "boots on the ground" and my partner being the money, is that the money investor just puts up the money. I'd find the house (both our names would go on the title), rehab the house (plus, in my case, I'm a licensed deleader so the property would get Lead Certificates too), then get the house sold.
During the process, I'd take small salary ($1500 a week) that would come off my half of the profit in the end. I'd give 6 months on the market and if the house didn't sell my name would come off the title and my remaining share of the profits is forfeit and the house is owned entirely by the money partner. That means if the house was overpriced and didn't sell, the selling price could be reduced by my share and the money partner still gets their full share of the profit. Worst case if the market dropped out, the money partner owns the house solo and could then rent it out, or lease option, or go with whatever secondary strategy they choose.
For the sake of this example, we'll assume the money partner is all cash and let's use $200k as the purchase, $40k rehab (includes my salary for me doing the work and materials), 8 week time frame ($12k in salary to me out of that $40k), resale of $300k. So the money partner is all in for $240k. We'll assume $10k in closing and holding costs that brings it up to $250k, leaving $50k in profit ($25k per partner). Subtract the $12k off my half that I already took as my salary and that leaves $13k to me and $37k to the money partner. The money partner gets their half of the profit, plus a refund on the salary he paid out to me during the rehab.
I know the math is a little tough to follow and people might say that I shouldn't get paid during the rehab... let's say I did the work without the salary, that would increase the profit by $12k to $62k. Each partner then would get $31k, so the money partner actually makes more in the first scenario with me getting paid during the project.
Yes, I would make more money to wait to the end, instead of $25k I'd get $31k, but that doesn't mitigate the risk.
Structuring it this way minimizes the risk for both partners and motivates me to get it done as quickly and inexpensively as possible. The quicker it gets done, the more I make in the end.
Worst case if the market crashes during the process and the house doesn't sell at $300k after 6 months on the market, then my name comes off the deed and the money partner can reduce the price by $25k and still make their expected profit. (If it was only reduced by $13k then they'd still get their refund on the salary I got as well.) In this worst case scenario, I'd still get a fair wage for the work I put in rehabbing like any other job I would have done during that time and only lose out on the payout in the end. The money partner gets to keep the house and rent it out until the market comes back up.
Even a worst case scenario is still a win/win and no one walks away feeling like they were taken advantage of. The fact is, the market is variable and can change at a moment's notice. That's out of both partner's control. If both partners walk away feeling good about the project even in the worst case, then they will gladly work together in the future when the market comes back up and make more money together, right?
Good luck on your investment!!