I’m not a lawyer, but as someone who has had an agreement tested, I’m curious where the fraud lies (no pun intended).
There have been two recurring points in this thread, Morris says contradictory things, so is he lying then or now, and two, the contracts people have seen are terrible with all sorts of blanks.
I’m not a fan of fraudsters and think it is terrible. But also believe 100% caveat emptor. If it sounds too good to be true...
So, working backwards, what is the framework of the obligation and deliverable by Morris? The contract. If the contract is incomplete or missing details, as stated several times above, whose position does that weaken? Think maybe they’re sloppy for a reason? Is Morris liable for a certain house quality if he said it to the camera but the signed doc says nothing? If nothing is written what was the expectation, and why would a buyer sign a contract with blanks? They could have had a lawyer review the docs at execution I’m sure. In the foreclosure crisis, was it the banks’ fault, or borrowers for not reading what they signed?
two, this is a national television personality everyone knows from a decade on air. He is hosting a show still, just on a different platform. He’s not guaranteeing anyone anything. It may sound like it, which is intended, but my guess is there’s probably specific word choice that is ambiguous where it needs to be. I don’t listen to him, but something like, “you can make millions” versus “you will make millions”. Both sound similar when you’re thinking about making millions, but you get my drift.
Remember, even Roger Clemens was found innocent. Just “misremembers”. The question is, how much money did Morris save for a lawyer? Maybe the Empire star’s guy is available since he didn’t get named with Avenatti in the Nike suit.