@Account Closed - I'm torn on this one.
I understand and respect the input from @Jerel Ehlert (and if asked in my capacity as an attorney I would provide the same response).
But then I ask myself, as an investor, would asking an attorney move the needle on the deal? I.e., would an attorney pointing out potential issues change my willingness to invest? For the most part (at least for me), it likely wouldn't, because I think the potential issues are almost always the same, and they are business/operator issues, not legal issues. I am also assuming that the LP understands what being an LP typically entails. If the person is brand new to it, then I think a discussion with an experienced attorney would be very helpful. And in all events, the LP herself should read the PPM, as @Mike Dymski says.
I'll acknowledge that I'm making broad generalizations that may not hold true in all situations, but are probably more-or-less true for most syndications (and are true for those I've reviewed) - so here's what I mean:
As a typical LP, you'll have zero ability to influence the terms of the PPM (perhaps if you're funding 25% or more you can get some concessions). If you can't negotiate terms, then the potential LP decides either a "yes, I invest" or "no, I'll pass".
What are the terms that matter, from a legal perspective? Well, 5 of the key items are going to be liability, contributions, distributions, transfers and control. For most syndications:
- LPs will have no liability (other than loss of contributions) and you'll want to check the liability of the GPs;
- LPs will make initial contributions; and you'll want to confirm if LP is on the hook for any additional contributions;
- Distributions will ensure the GP/operator gets their cut (I'd want to know what that cut is), then to LPs in accordance with their percentage;
- LPs will agree that they cannot transfer their LP interest without the consent of the GP - you're locked in to the deal until the GPs end it;
- LPs will have none (or very little) rights to vote on operations, and GP has control.
The above isn't an exhaustive list of material concerns you might have as an LP, but it's what what I would expect and confirm for any syndication. If I assume the above is true, then I'm basically left with due diligence on the GP/operator and the property/offering itself. As @Chris Seveney and @Michael Bishop say, it's trusting (with due diligence) the operator. If I wasn't comfortable confirming the above on my own, then I would definitely seek help from an attorney.
Always happy to consider any differing opinions or questions.