OK
I read several forum posts and blogs before I posted this and then some more after. I was just trying to get some more current information and hopefully start a conversation with someone that has hands on knowledge.
The seller should look out for he same stuff they would normally do or that a lender would do. They should also make sure they really want to take this kind of risk. Sounds like some people use this as a tactic to try and string out the seller and renegotiate later for a deeper discount. Not that that's bad, just that they should consider it.
Looks like you should always use a lawyer in these situations.
Granted I only spoke with one but from what I understand a broker would try to come up with some creative financing or private money to make the deal work rather than assisting with structuring the loan.
It seems like a lease option or some other rent to own program would be easier to get the property back if it fails but you wouldn't be able to get a substantial down payment. Also you would be liable for the property still as on its still yours. Property tax, insurance and what ever the buyer is doing with it (meth lab, pot farm, antique collecting).
If you have a few minutes and notice anything I missed or am wrong about here please feel free to point it out.
Thanks